Liberalism’s True Content of Character

Be sure to Click LIKE at the bottom of this article, and share it everywhere!! By Craig Andresen – The National Patriot and Right Side Patriots – Commentary

Skin color is arguably the most identifiable thing about a person, and at the same time, arguably the most unimportant aspect of any given person.

Gender says a lot too when it comes to describing someone, and perhaps more information can be discerned along gender lines, but it is skin color, a physical trait and nothing more that always seems to be at the forefront of a description.

It’s like describing a car, or a house…a red car, or the white house in the middle of the block.  Aside from the most basic identifier, nothing of importance is attached to skin color. The car could be a sports model, or a sedan just as the house could be a Tudor or a ranch. The person could be tall, short, skinny, heavy or any number of other things including highly successful, or barely scraping by.

Liberals are, and always have been fixated on skin color. To them, that is the most important aspect of any person, and that is on full display in their political agenda. To liberal Marxists, if you’re white, you are systemically racist, overly privileged, and in need of being indoctrinated, woke, and shamed. On the other hand, if you happen to be any skin color other than white, you are oppressed, held back, in dire need of government and societal assistance and incapable of achieving your potential due of course to white people.

To liberal Marxists, it has gotten to the point that you must vote according to the color of your skin…if you’re black…or you just aren’t…black.

That was a stunning thing to say, and you can bet good money that had some white Republican said anything like that, there would have been hell to pay. The mainstream media propagandists would have impeached Trump for uttering such nonsense, and they would have demanded the cancellation of any other white Republican in any line of work had they caught wind of any so absurd of a statement.

But not Biden. Not one of their own. And why, exactly, is that?

Before LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act in 1964, his party, then the democrat party and now the liberal Marxist party had spent well over 100 years enslaving and holding black people back. The Confederates in the Civil War…that was the democrats. The KKK…that was the democrats. Jim Crow laws, segregation, all of it created by and perpetrated by the democrat party. When he signed the Civil Rights Act in 1964, LBJ reportedly said, “I’ll have them niggers voting Democratic for two hundred years.”

While some “historians” claim there is no proof that LBJ said it, it was reported on page 33 of Ronald Kessler’s book, Inside the White House: The Hidden Lives of the Modern Presidents and the Secrets of the World’s Most Powerful Institution, and Kessler said that it was overheard by Ronald M. MacMillan, a former Air Force One steward Kessler had interviewed for the book.

The statement is neither out of context nor out of character for LBJ. According to Doris Kearns Goodwin, a historian of some note, LBJ also said, “These Negroes, they’re getting pretty uppity these days and that’s a problem for us since they’ve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we’ve got to do something about this, we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference. For if we don’t move at all, then their allies will line up against us and there’ll be no way of stopping them, we’ll lose the filibuster and there’ll be no way of putting a brake on all sorts of wild legislation. It’ll be Reconstruction all over again.”

To minority readers, does that sound like a man who deserved to be the champion of black people in America, or the leader of the political party that deserved your votes for 200 years? Think about it. LBJ said, “we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference.” Now ask yourselves how accurate or inaccurate that statement in conjunction with the previous statement has proven to be.

Several years ago, Charles Barkley said, “Black people have been voting for Democrats their whole life, and they’re still poor.”

In other words, black people in America got them a little something from the democrat party to quiet them down…not enough to make a difference…and they’re still voting for democrats.

Make no mistake, it was LBJ who set the foundation for today’s party of Liberal Marxists, and although both he and that party are still the party most black Americans reward with their votes, it was LBJ who said of his black chauffeur, who had told Johnson that  he would prefer to be called by name instead of “boy,” “nigger” or “chief”: “As long as you are black, and you’re gonna be black till the day you die, no one’s gonna call you by your goddamn name. So no matter what you are called, nigger, you just let it roll off your back like water, and you’ll make it. Just pretend you’re a goddamn piece of furniture.”

Do you know what else got its start in 1964? Welfare. Was welfare really meant to lift people out of poverty as LBJ claimed? Of course not. It was designed to provide for poor people, most notably poor black people as an alternative to becoming self-reliant. The idea was, get them hooked, addicted to a government assistance program, and they will continue to vote for the party that started it, and kept it funded with other people’s money.

What the democrat party then, and the party of liberal Marxists today were and are telling minorities is that they were, or are incapable of self-reliance, and any party or candidate who vows to cut or limit welfare is pure evil. Welfare was, and is meth for the black masses.

Affirmative Action was President John F. Kennedy’s creation in 1961 to ensure that applicants are “treated equally without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.” Where employment was concerned,  it was LBJ  in 1965 who began to pervert it into a system by which minorities were given preferential access. It then became a political tool by which both democrat and Republican presidents tried garner votes. It was Nixon who extended it to give preferential status to minority students in higher education.

Can you see what was happening? Suddenly, the color of a person’s skin had become the most important aspect of any given person. Let’s say there just one slot available for a job, or admission to a particular college or university, and there were two equally qualified people trying to get that slot. If one was of a minority skin color, that’s who got the spot. In other words people became more, or less equal based on the color of their skin. If those slots were automatically being given to white people it would have immediately been deemed racist, but because they were, by government decree being given to those of a minority skin color, all was right with the world. The History of Affirmative Action might surprise some people, but not liberals, which is why they would rather you not know that history.

So far, everything I’ve mentioned was put into place half a century ago, so let’s jump 50 years to the present, to the here and now. What’s changed?

The verbage has changed, but the desired outcome remains the same.

50 years ago, we were told it was all for the sake of equality. Today, it’s all about equity and those are two very different things. Equality means that each individual or group of people is given the same resources or opportunities to excel in life. Equity means that each person has different circumstances and allocates the exact resources and opportunities needed to reach an equal outcome. Equity is equality by government decree and let’s face a hard cold fact here, government has no way of making everybody equal at the top rung of the socioeconomic ladder, but is very capable, via socialism or Marxism to make everybody equal at the bottom rung of the ladder.

In other words, striving for liberal Marxist equity isn’t meant to make everyone equally prosperous, it’s orchestrated with the goal of making everybody equally poor and reliant on the government.

Liberal Marxists today hate the idea of voter ID, and they have gone to great lengths to tell us that such a system will suppress the minority vote because, they tell us, most minority people in America, based on the color of their skin, can’t get a voter ID card.

Pay attention here black and other minority readers…today’s liberal Marxists, the party most minority people in America vote for, are telling you that you are incapable, based on that one thing that always has been and still is most important to that party…your skin color…you are incapable of getting a voter ID.

Obviously, too many minorities in this country simply believe whatever today’s liberal Marxists tell them, but, that’s a lie. There are millions of minority people in America today with ID’s. Driver’s licenses. Minorities are flying from place to place, and from our country to other countries which they could not do without a valid ID. Millions of minorities in this country have bank accounts, which they could not open without a valid ID. Many minority voters in states that require an ID have them and vote.

But today’s liberal Marxists insist that requiring an ID to vote is just plain racist, and they point to “systemic racism” as the root of such evil as to require an ID for the purpose of voting. They say that poor minority people in this country just don’t have the access, or the privilege that white people have to obtain an ID for the purpose of voting.

Well, guess what else you need an ID for…applying for and receiving welfare which was created to make the minority population of this country reliant upon, and addicted to other people’s money being doled out by the government.

So, how is it that so many minority folks in this country actually manage to get an ID and achieve great things? How is it that so many black, brown, yellow and red people manage to get an education, a good job, move from the inner city to the suburbs, drive nice cars and travel either for business of pleasure while others in the minority communities are wearing their pants at half mast, cashing taxpayer funded welfare checks, selling or doing drugs or committing crimes that land them in prison?

Well…I can tell you this, and you can take it to the bank…it has nothing whatsoever to do with the color of their skin, arguably the most identifiable thing about a person, and at the same time, arguably the most unimportant aspect of any given person…and everything to do with what is arguably the least identifiable thing about a person and at the same time, the most important aspect of ANY person…

The content of their character.

Copyright © 2021 Craig Andresen / thenationalpatriot.com all rights reserved

Be sure to Click LIKE below, and share it everywhere!!

************************************************************************************************

For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Diane Sori’s blog The Patriot Factor to read her latest op-ed  DOJ Investigation DOA

*************************************************************************************************

RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS…LIVE!
Tomorrow, Tuesday, August 3rd, from 7 to 8:30pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss ‘DOJ Investigation DOA’; ‘Liberalism’s True Content of Character’; and important news of the day.
Hope you can tune in to RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS on https://rspradio1.com. Click ‘LISTEN LIVE’ starting at 6:50 pm EST with the show beginning at 7pm EST.
 

4 thoughts on “Liberalism’s True Content of Character

  1. I have always wondered what the country would be like “IF”: Lincoln, the Kennedy Brothers, Martin Luther King and yes ~ even Malcom X had NOT been assassinated? What “IF” LBJ had not become President? Woodrow Wilson AND LBJ really hurt this society ~ BADLY!

    This is a Very Uncomfortable article. It goes against the current popular perceptions that are being promoted to the populace. I lived through the 50s and progress WAS happening. The Wizard of Westwood, John Wooden was perhaps the most outstanding example of that progress. Then ~ LBJ ascended the ladder to the presidency and the progress WAS TRASHED.

    Sometime in the late 20s a communist pointed out that America’s Achilles Heel was the race issue. Exploit THAT and America can be brought down. The outlook is NOT optimistic. Thomas Sowell said the home team is behind 5 runs and it is the bottom of the 9th with 2 outs. Well ~ ~ ~ ~ ?

  2. Enjoyed the article and History lesson, although I knew all of this History already, your take on skin color and its “importance” to the Marxist/Socialist/Progressive/Liberal/Democrats (all one and the same) as a tool to keep Minorities “addicted to Government” and “under control” is spot on.

    I agree with your take completely and wish it could be shared with minorities everywhere. They may not agree (out of pride) but it would certainly get them thinking. The truth is, the Democrats have never changed. They’re still as “racist” as ever with segregation as their ultimate divisive goal.
    They don’t really care about racism, but like LBJ, it’s the best wedge in their toolbox.

  3. I wonder,… how much different would the word be if MLK had said, instead, paraphrasing, “I have a dream… that one day all people would be given preferential treatment and judged by the color of their skin rather than the content of their character, and that government would be the bludgeoning tool used to put down any color deemed by the liberal-Marxist to have ‘too much privilege’…”?

Comments are closed.