Bugs Bunny Was Right…What a Maroon

Quote

By Craig Andresen Right Side Patriots http://www.americanpbn.com/

As bugs bunny would say…mor 1

“What a maroon…”

The man who would be POTUS…the loon followed by blind, low-information voters…Donald J. Trump…is now bordering on displaying the collective intelligence of a sack of potatoes.

My apologies to spuds everywhere.

Given that whoever the next POTUS is, that person will be tasked with appointing at least one, if not several Supreme Court Justices and one would think…no…one would HOPE that whoever that is has, at the very least, an inkling of what the job of a Supreme Court Justice actually is.

Now we KNOW that Ted Cruz knows exactly what the duties of the SCOTUS are. After all, Cruz has argued several cases before the nation’s highest court and as a Constitutional expert, Cruz knows full well that the SCOTUS interprets the Constitution were our laws are concerned. It is the job of the SCOTUS to determine whether or not our laws meet Constitutional muster.

But moron Don?

Continue reading

DT=BS – Hey Trumpers…Feel the Bern

By Craig Andresen Right Side Patriots http://www.americanpbn.com/

Over the past several weeks, I have written and published several articles highlighting dtbs 1Donald Trump’s liberal leanings. In those articles, I have included numerous videos of Trump, in his own words, extolling liberal views on many, many issues.

From his vies regarding abortion and partial birth abortion to his take on gun control to his steadfast belief in universal, single payer healthcare and his support for liberals like Hillary Clinton.

Naturally, the Trump drunk supporters of this liberal candidate have been vile, vulgar and accused me of lying about their one and only.

In that way, they are just like Trump himself, and as blind as Obama’s supporters have been for the past eight years.

Now, there is but one last video to show…

Continue reading

Speaking of Donald Trump…

By Craig Andresen Right Side Patriots http://www.americanpbn.com/

Donald Trump…the unhinged, narcissistic, liberal-leaning, Trumper-tantrum throwing, whining, vulgar, knee-jerk reactionary, afraid of a woman’s questions, Chinese-made campaign hat mogul and moonbat who’s meltdowns are now edging Charlie Sheen out of the #1 position in the realm of EPIC meltdowns, had THIS to say about Ted Cruz just a couple of days ago…

“Ted Cruz is a totally unstable individual.”

Trump…the something less than a man who once PRAISED Megyn Kelly before calling her a bimbo and then later, cowardly ditching a debate because SHE was one of the moderators…the guy who once compared Ben Carson to a CHILD MOLESTER before becoming his BFF said THIS about Ted Cruz just a few days ago…

“Cruz has become unhinged and is lying with the hopes that his statements will go unchecked until after the election and he will save his failing campaign.”

Speaking of hoping his statements will go unchecked…

Continue reading

Our Greatest Domestic Threat is Now an Open Seat

By Craig Andresen Right Side Patriots http://www.americanpbn.com/

Suddenly, with the death of Justice Scalia, the appointment of a ninth Justice to the Supreme Court has takesup 1n on more weight than most would have previously believed necessary in this, an election year.

Just as weighty as the decision as to who should nominate our next Supreme Court Justice is how any nominee will view Constitutional theory or how that person will interpret the Constitution.

Along those lines, there are five basic theories of Constitutional interpretation. Generally, those theories are as follows: (1) the text and structure of the Constitution, (2) intentions of those who drafted, voted to propose, or voted to ratify the provision in question, (3) prior precedents (usually judicial), (4) the social, political, and economic consequences of alternative interpretations, and (5) natural law. There is general agreement that the first three of these sources are appropriate guides to interpretation, but considerable disagreement as to the relative weight that should be given to the three sources when they point in different directions. Many interpreters of the Constitution have suggested that the consequences of alternative interpretations are never relevant, even when all other considerations are evenly balanced. Natural law (higher law, God’s law) is now only infrequently suggested as an interpretive guide, even though many of the framers of the Constitution recognized its appropriateness. Persons who favor heavy reliance on originalist sources (text and intentions) are commonly called “originalists.” Persons who favor giving a more substantial weighting to precedent, consequences, or natural law are called “non-originalists.” In practice, disagreement between originalists and non-originalists often concerns whether to apply heightened judicial scrutiny to certain “fundamental rights” that are not explicitly protected in the text of the Constitution.

Continue reading