Corrupt Intentions…Dire Implications – Part 2 of 2

Earlier, in “Corrupt Intentions…Dire Implications – Part 1,” I outlined how FBI imp-1Director, James Comey, ignored a mountain of evidence that showed clear intent on the part of Hillary Clinton to break the laws of our land and how, whether or not she knew she was violating our laws, it should not have absolved her from prosecution.

I also stated that the implications of this ongoing situation were dire.

Let me jump right in and outline those implications and I’ll start where nobody else is going…with James Comey himself.

If, as some reports are stating, Comey and the FBI had all of Hillary’s emails well before last week’s announcement and reopening of the investigation into her illegal private server and illegal private email account…and by well before, it has been reported that Comey may well have had access to what is now being characterized as the new discovery of 650,000 emails on the computer belonging to Anthony Weiner and his estranged wife, Huma Abedin, before last July when Comey himself testified to Congress that he lacked evidence of “intent” on Hillary’s part and therefore declined to indict her…the implications are indeed dire.

If that is shown to be the case…

It means that the Director of the FBI withheld key evidence in an official investigation that imp-2could lead to charges of treason, espionage and more. That would call into question each and every case handled by the FBI under Comey’s watch and every investigation would have to be reopened to see if there was any evidence withheld in them as well. In fact, it could, if shown to be so, alter the charges and/or the outcomes of those cases.

The sheer legal aspect of that is staggering as would be the costs of reexamining those cases, the potential retrial of some of those cases and the inevitable lawsuits that would be filed against the government as a result of any misdeeds done during those cases. Remember…the government doesn’t have any money to pay off lawsuits that it doesn’t take from the American taxpayer so while the government would be the defendant in any such case that might be brought…you and I, the American citizens would be paying the penalty.

Then there are the dire implications regarding the election process. If true, that Comey had those emails before his announced decision not to indict Hillary back in July…his actions, or inactions allowed a potential federally convicted felon to become her party’s presidential nominee and correct me if I’m wrong, but I would think that Bernie Sanders, as much as I don’t care for him, as well as registered democrats who voted for her in the primaries and those who voted for Sanders would all have a case against the American government that could well become the largest class action lawsuit in history.

Again, any financial penalty of that nature would hang directly on the shoulders of the American taxpayers…which means that even those suing as a result of it, would, in effect, be paying themselves part of the settlement.

imp-3As Loretta Lynch, the Attorney General under Obama would also be implicated in the refusal to indict Hillary…it would throw both the nation’s top law enforcement agency and the nation’s entire justice agency into a tailspin as at that point, any cases tried by Lynch’s Department of Justice would also need to be reexamined.

Then, there would be the cases against Hillary’s subordinates and minions, people including but not limited to Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills, Patrick Kennedy and other Department of State employees along with the likes of Sydney Blumenthal and Hillary’s attorney, David Kennedy. Many of those who were passing classified emails and documents amongst themselves and others never had security clearance to see or handle classified or sensitive documents.

That raises another important question which leads to more dire implications…how do you try those who broke the law in passing along, storing, or deleting sensitive and in some cases, classified documents…who lacked proper security clearance if the judges, lawyers and juries involved in said cases aren’t allowed to see or hear the details of the very documents in question…documents so sensitive or classified that not even members of Congress are allowed access to them?

It’s a nightmare.

All of this leads upimp-4 the ladder to the highest levels of government and the proportion of the dire implications only grows…to the point of a Constitutional crisis.

Obviously, the two key players in this would be Hillary Clinton, the liberal nominee who could win the presidency next week, and Barack Hussein Obama, the current and soon to be former president of the United States.

If what we believe to be contained within the cache of650,000 emails “recently” discovered emails on the jointly owned home laptop computer of Huma Abedin and her estranged husband, Anthony Weiner…emails, documents and correspondence regarding Benghazi that could lead to charges of espionage and worse…treason…what then?

The potential of having a sitting president and her predecessor both charged with Treason and espionage against their country…against our country…is bone-crushingly dire.

Should Hillary win, which I believe now could only occur in three ways…the splitting of the Republican vote via 3rd party and write-in voters…outright voter fraud…or both…and any felonious charges be brought against her up to and including treason…the nation would potentially be left with a president of a convicted felon’s or traitor’s choosing…Tim Kane.

If such charges are brought against Obama…where would that leave the nation imp-5considering his signatures on treaties and international deals? Would the nation be legally bound to such deals, good bad or otherwise, signed by a potentially convicted felon or traitor?

And finally…what of justice itself should any or all of those in positions of power, then, now or in the future…skate on their crimes? How does a nation maintain a system of justice when it leaders are above the law or at the very least, publicly shown to the people to be above the law?

And further, what of justice if judges at a federal level, including to the Supreme Court, are being nominated by a president who herself has sought to evade justice, stall investigations and has broken our most closely held laws? Imagine the sort of judges someone like Hillary, with her history of illegal and corrupt activities, would nominate and imagine your chances should you ever, for political reasons, be faced with being tried by such a judge.

Yes, this is speculation, but any risk assessment worth the paper on which it’s written must take into account every possibility, including the worst possible scenarios.

imp-6As a nation, we must weigh the risks and consider all possible outcomes and should Hillary be elected next week, there are no positive outcomes to be had…all possibilities are bleak at best, dire at worst. So, with only a few days until the election, what steps can and must be taken to provide a glimmer of hope given the nightmare before us?

Hillary Clinton must either willingly end her candidacy immediately, or be forced out of the race by her party immediately. Yes, I understand the concept of innocent until proven guilty, but the stakes are far too high to take the chance. If Hillary had any intent of doing what’s best for the nation, she would pull the plug today, but obviously, had the best interests of the nation been even a fleeting thought in her mind, she wouldn’t have taken the actions she has so obviously taken over the last 8 years to begin with.

She has nobody but herself to blame for the predicament that both she, and we now face.

If neither Hillary, nor her party take that path, the ending of her campaign immediately, there imp-7is but one other course of action for the American public to take and that is to render an early verdict, in the court of public opinion by not voting for her next Tuesday. Even democrats and her most ardent supporters must be made to realize the intensely dire situation should she be elected.

Those who purport to be on the right side of the aisle, and yet intend to cast a 3rd party or write-in vote also must be made aware of the deeply dire nature of what splitting the vote means at this most crucial moment in time.

While Trump is far from a perfect candidate, and far from what many deem to be an appropriate candidate, even with all his faults and there are many, he is nowhere near the impending nightmare that would be a Hillary Clinton victory and whether or not those conscience voters are willing or ready to admit it, they know I’m right.

I understand completely that a good number of folks are sick and tired of voting for the lesser of two evils but they must realize, as I have, that somebody will always be the lesser of the evils and to put a fine point on that concept, whoever their candidate of choice imp-8might be, either write-in or 3rd party…that candidate isn’t perfect either and is therefore the lesser, in their mind, of the rest of the possible evils.

With everything on the line, and I mean everything…considering the scenarios connected to a Hillary victory next week that range from worse to absolute worst…now simply isn’t the time to prove your disgust by intentionally throwing an election to someone on the brink of what could well be a multitude of federal indictments that reach all the way up the crime ladder to treason against our country.

I also know full-well, that there are those who will throw up their hands and say that they will simply leave this all to God. Well, guess what? If God was apt to medal in our political landscape, we wouldn’t be facing what we’re facing today and no amount of hitting one’s knees and praying like there’s no tomorrow will alter the fact that unless we, as voters take matters into our own hands, there may well be no tomorrow.imp-9

God doesn’t declare our election winners, we the people do and if you don’t know that fact by now…you’re not part of the solution, you’re a major part of the problem and if you don’t know the right course of action by now, not even God can help you.

Donald Trump is a lot of things but he is not politically corrupt nor does he sport the 30 year long resume of political corruption Hillary Clinton embodies and even the conscience voters must know, as I know, that only one of the two viable candidate who will win the election next week will do anything to wrest the corrupt from the halls of our federal government. Hillary would do nothing but surround herself with them, promote them, protect them and wallow about in their shared corruption.

Trump is not nor will he be our nation’s savior…that job is up to we the people and that job has to start somewhere before it is too late. Trump would be the beginning of the turn-around…not the end of it while Hillary would be the end of the republic as we know it leaving no opportunity to ever again steer clear of the abyss of socialism.

There imp-10are but a scant few days left, and only one last opportunity to make the only choice that will begin the process of taking our country back.

We must elect Donald Trump or forever face the dire implications of pretending to take the moral high ground by voting for anyone else.

Dire implications?

Dire implications indeed.

To read Corrupt Intentions…Dire Implications – Part 1…click here.

REMINDER!!!

RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS…LIVErsp-small-1a

Today, Friday November 4th, from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss how all Hillary’s current woes go back to Benghazi, examine the dire implications of next Tuesday’s election, and discuss James Comey’s and others hand in all this.

Hope you will tune in at: bit.ly/2cpXuRd