Tag Archives: eligibility

Obama’s Eligibility…Not One Shred of Authentic Verifiable Evidence

Posted on by

In the wake of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s press conference regarding his Cold Case Posse’s investigation into Obama’s documents, we are left with some questions.

These questions are NOT new questions but they bear asking again and now, since an official law enforcement agency has finally investigated and issued a report, perhaps these questions gain in validity.

Yes, many others have raised these questions and rightfully so. The questions began nearly 4 years ago but, for the sake of sticking to the documents in question, we will confine our points to questions raised within the last year.

On April 25th 2011, Obama “released” his “official certificate of live birth” in a press conference from the white house briefing room. Nearly immediately, those who knew of such things as computers, graphics, layering and such, called into question the process employed in creating this birth certificate.

Not for a minute should their efforts be discounted in questioning the validity of it. Indeed, they set the stage for this official law enforcement investigation and without doubt, they deserve credit for their work. The difference is, while they did indeed know their stuff, they were not affiliated with an official law enforcement investigation and therefore, were ripe for ridicule, ripe for what we now KNOW was UNWARRANTED ridicule.

Now, to the questions regarding the long form birth certificate which MUST be asked, AGAIN, because of the OFFICIAL LAW ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATION, conducted by the office of Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Maricopa County Arizona.

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Why Sheriff Joe’s Finding Are SO Important

Posted on by

This afternoon, the much awaited results of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse were made known. Arpaio presented the evidence to a room full of reporters and used a multi-media presentation to show the process.

Without going into detail, the results were not all that surprising as we already suspected what we learned.

Regarding Obama’s birth certificate, the Cold Case Posse utilized forensic document experts to show HOW it was created. The document was indeed layered but, by showing a control document, the experts were able to explain how a computer scan will layer, in more than 100 layers, such a document.

Those layers are random. A computer scan will take portions of a given document randomly and layer them together until the full document is processed. A bit here, a parcel there, no rhyme no reason.

Obama’s birth certificate, on the other hand, contained only 9 layers. That, while not at all consistent with a computer scan of a document, was not the real surprise. In those 9 layers, each layer contained a perfectly logical order.

For instance, all the names were on one layer. All the dates were on one layer. All the information of any certain topic was contained in its own layer.

This simply never happens with a computer scan. In fact, according to forensic document experts, the ONLY way that happens if a human is controlling the creation of the document.

The conclusion regarding the birth certificate was that it is 100% fraudulent.

Much the same techniques and processes with a few differences created Obama’s Selective Service card. It simply did not match, in appearance or standard date stamps used in 1980 to a real, authentic Selective Service card.

The Card also was found to be 100% fraudulent.

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Obama Eligibility and a Decision of Tyranny

Posted on by

With the ruling by Judge Malihi in Georgia that Obama will remain on the ballot, tyranny has been established.

How else does one describe it when the President is above the law?

A court issues a subpoena to the President which is ignored.

The court rules against a motion to dismiss.

The attorney for the defendant, Obama, states he will not participate or provide subpoenaed material.

The Georgia Secretary of State says such action will be at the attorney’s and his client’s peril.

The hearing proceeds with the only evidence and testimony presented being against the defendant.

One week later, the Judge finds in favor of the defendant.

Clearly, speculation will be forthcoming. How did this happen? Was the Judge bought? Was he threatened? Was it all fixed before the hearing ever happened?

People will want to know the background of the Judge.

I’m SURE there are some coincidences involved.

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

URGENT BREAKING…OBAMA ELIGIBILITY RULING IN GEORGIA

Posted on by

URGENT BREAKING NEWS!!!

On Thursday, Feb. 2nd 2012, exactly 1 week after the court hearing in Georgia regarding Obama’s eligibility to appear on that state’s ballot for the 2012 elections, and after neither Obama nor his attorney participated in that hearing, a motion was filed by the Liberty Legal Foundation.

“…that the Superior Court find the Defendant in willful contempt of Court, and that the Superior Court impose sanctions commensurate with an act that threatens the foundations of our Constitutional Republic.”

There have over the course of our nation’s history, been several times when a President has been subpoenaed and until last week, each of those Presidents has complied with the court’s orders.

Last week, Obama and his attorney sent a clear message that Obama was above the law and need not answer to the judicial branch.

Indeed, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, sent a letter to the Georgia Secretary of State a day ahead of the hearing stating neither he nor his client would take part in the hearing. Sec. of State Kemp then warned Jablonski that the choice was his but such a course of inaction would be at Jablonski’s, and his client’s, Obama’s peril.

WE NOW HAVE A RULING FROM THE JUDGE, THE HON. MICHAEL MALIHI…

IT HAS BEEN FOUND THAT OBAMA WILL …WE REPEAT… WILL…BE ALLOWED ON THE GEORGIA BALLOT!!!!!

 

As evidence and testimony was presented last Thursday, January 26th, in a Georgia courtroom regarding Obama’s past, his birth certificate, his Social Security number, his citizenship, his having lived in two different countries at the same time and more, the centerpiece of the hearing was his status as a Natural Born Citizen.

The Constitution clearly states one must BE a Natural Born Citizen to serve as President.

The plaintiffs and their legal teams, presented a strong case against Obama’s status as such. That part of the hearing revolved around the known fact that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen and an 1875 Supreme Court opining stating that a Natural Born Citizen would need parents…PLURAL…to qualify.

That case opinion from Minor vs Happersett, has been the lynchpin of this argument.

With NO evidence or testimony whatsoever was presented in Obama’s defense, Judge Mahili HAS found Obama ELIGIBLE for the Georgia ballot!!

While we expect this ruling to be appealed…for now…Obama IS on the ballot!!

As 6 other states are now considering such action in their courts, it is unknown how this ruling will effect those cases.

FOR FULL ANALYSIS OF THE RULING, PLEASE CLICK HERE!!


 

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Media Silence on Obama Eligibility Raises Questions

Posted on by

Since my article regarding the blow-by-blow account of the Georgia hearing on Obama’s eligibility to appear on that state’s ballot, one question has surfaced more than any other. This is a question which has been posed to me via social media, email and within the nearly 600 comments on that article.

The question is a simple one and a valid one.

Why has there been no media coverage of this?

Clearly, it’s a story.

A sitting President gets subpoenaed. Story.

A sitting President’s ability to be on a state’s ballot at risk. Story.

A sitting president’s attempt to dismiss the case denied. Story.

A sitting president ignores the subpoena. Story.

A sitting President’s attorney sends letter to Georgia Sec. of State saying he won’t participate. Story.

Sec. of State says don’t participate at your own risk. Story.

Hearing takes place, witnesses testify and evidence is presented with no refute from Sitting President’s attorney. Story.

NO MEDIA COVERAGE??? Story.

First, let’s have a look at the media.

The alphabet networks, also known as the mainstream or elite media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC etc. are all in the can for Obama or in his pocket. We all know that.

Why would they all of a sudden cover a story so potentially harmful to the guy who sends shivers up their collective legs?

This is the media arm of the Obama administration after all. These are the very people who refused to vet candidate Obama and anointed him their supreme leader. They went all in. They shielded Obama during the campaign, they have provided cover during his 3 years in office, they’ve been outwardly dismissive of any mention of his eligibility, they’ve labeled any who question it as nuts, mobs, terrorists, and worse.

At this point, when it actually gains a hearing before a judge and neither Obama nor his attorney show up even under subpoena, why would they now lend credibility to it?

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Obama’s Eligibility, A Constitutional Crisis in the Making

Posted on by

How exactly does one go about constructing a Constitutional crisis?

It can’t be done easily and it takes a concerted effort to contradict the very framework of our nation.

Obama is in the midst of such a creation.

If Georgia Judge, the Hon. Michael Malihi, returns a verdict disallowing Obama’s name from the Georgia ballot, a Constitutional crisis could well be the outcome. The threat of such an event can be no reason to issue a ruling which would avoid it.

In last week’s Georgia hearing, neither Obama nor his attorney were present. Obama was campaigning in Nevada and his attorney, Michael Jablonski, issued to the Georgia Sec. of State the previous day, his intention of non participation.

Regardless of the outcome and the decision of the Judge, an appeal will certainly follow and should the Judge rule against Obama, expect an injunction to be filed preventing the Georgia Sec. of State from taking action to remove Obama from the ballot.

One of the things which is sure to be brought into play by Jablonski is Executive Privilege.

It will be claimed that Obama, as sitting President, has the Executive Privilege to ignore the subpoena of the court.

We believe this will be met with resistance by the legal team for the plaintiffs.

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

Obama Eligibility and the Gotcha Liberals

Posted on by

It’s time I suppose to deal with some of the neener neener liberals out there. I know a few and a suspect you do too.

Liberals won’t do their homework or, they’ll only do it up to a point. They will parse out only what backs their position without bothering to mention the whole story.

You and I both know this kind of liberal, don’t we?

These are the Obama Kool Aid drinkers who just can’t bring themselves to the understanding that THEIR guy may well be in trouble and in order to deflect any talk of ineligibility, they try the old and worn…”Well, what about THESE Presidents…HUH?”…tact.

These liberals will lay upon you the names of other Presidents who had one or both parents born off soil so to speak so, let’s have a look shall we?

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

FULL ANALYSIS OF OBAMA ELIGIBILITY HEARING

Posted on by

For the first time, this morning in Georgia, the question of Obama’s eligibility to serve, became official. No longer the stuff of speculation, no longer dismissible by liberals as something which will never be heard in court, Obama’s eligibility became a matter of an official court record.

What does it mean?

To answer that, one must look at the reason for the hearing to begin with.

For years, Orly Taitz and the Liberty Legal Foundation along with others, have questioned Obama’s legal right to serve. For years, that argument centered on the birth certificate and whether or not Obama was born in the United States.

What made this case and this hearing different, is that it mattered not where Obama was born rather, at the center of the stage, would be the nationality of Obama’s father.

Obama’s father was never a U.S. Citizen and a great deal of evidence to that point was entered  into the official record this morning.

Another linchpin in all of this, is the definition of “Natural Born Citizen” which one must be, by writ of the Constitution, to hold the office of President. According to the plaintiffs in this hearing, that definition can be clearly found in the written opinion of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Minor vs Happersett from 1875.

That opinion, which by the way is backed up by several other Supreme Court opinions, states that for one to be a “Natural Born Citizen” both of one’s parents must be U.S. Citizens.

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

WATCH OBAMA ELIGIBILITY PROCEEDINGS LIVE

Posted on by

LINK TO WATCH PROCEEDINGS AT THE END OF THIS ARTICLE.

Yesterday, we told you a storm was coming to Georgia regarding Obama’s eligibility and the questions surrounding whether or not his name will appear on that state’s 2012 ballot.

There was no calm before the storm.

We expected activity leading up to this morning’s proceedings but the flurry and scope of that activity was indeed heated.

Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, who has tried everything he could think of in the last couple of weeks to get his client out of this, got desperate yesterday. Jablonski fired off a letter to Georgia’s Secretary of State making it clear that as far as HE was concerned, there was nothing to the case and neither he nor his client, Obama would participate.

Here is the final paragraph from that letter.

“We await your taking the requested action, and as we do so, we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26.”

In essence, Jablonski was ordering the Sec. of State in Georgia to call it off and as you can well imagine, that didn’t sit well with Secretary of State Kemp.

Continue reading →

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share

GAME ON…GA SEC. OF STATE SLAMS OBAMA ATTORNEY

Posted on by

Hours ago, we became aware of a letter sent from Obama attorney Michael Jablonski to the Georgia Secretary of State. In that letter, Jablonski made it clear than neither he, nor his client, Obama, would appear in a Georgia court tomorrow morning.

The case regarding Obama’s eligibility and his inclusion on the Georgia 2012 presidential ballot is ON.

This evening, the Georgia Secretary of State, the Hon. Brian P Kemp issues the following letter in response to Jablonski!!!

This means it’s game ON for tomorrow morning at 9am EST in Georgia.

Share on TumblrSubmit to redditShare via email Share