Posts Tagged ‘eligibility’

Is Obama a “Dreamer???”

Sunday, August 5th, 2012

Is it simple pandering to a voting bloc in the months leading to the election or, is it something far, far worse?

Frankly, it’s hard to tell and while neither is good, the outcome, either way, it is clearly against the very principles of this nation.

Last week, it came to light that an ICE agent was threatened with punishment…A 3 day suspension…And for WHAT exactly?

Enforcing the law.

The ICE agent in question arrested a 35 year old ILLEGAL immigrant because that ILLEGAL alien had amassed 10 traffic violations.

For an American citizen, according to the Newark Police Department, such an arrest would have landed the arrestee in jail.

In THIS case…ICE supervisors ordered the ILLEGAL alien to be RELEASED and now, the Agent who made the arrest is facing a 3 day suspension.

Why???

BECAUSE THE 35 YEAR OLD ILLEGAL ALIEN WITH 10 TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS IS “NOT A HIGH PRIORITY TARGET.”

Not a high priority target.

Tell THAT to Zach and Aileen Smith who, in a separate incident, were involved in a vehicle crash when their car was struck by…AN ILLEGAL ALIEN WHO HAD 4 DUI’s ON HIS RECORD!!! Aileen was 7 months pregnant and after being rushed to the hospital for an emergency C-Section found that her baby did NOT survive the crash.

(more…)

Did Cornered Obama Launch a Preemptive Strike?

Saturday, July 14th, 2012

Over the last several days, we have seen an uptick in the rhetoric from the Obama campaign and it’s all personal attacks against Mitt Romney.

Okay.

We fully expected that during this campaign and, we fully expect it not only to continue but, to get worse.

Lots worse.

We know Obama can’t run on his record and we know he’ll try to swing the topic away from things like jobs, unemployment, the debt, the economy, raising taxes and just about any part of his record or administration one cares to mention.

But what has transpired in the past few days may well be being mischaracterized by almost everybody in the press and the blogosphere.

What we are hearing most often are words and phrases like…”Jumped the shark” and “desperation.

Here’s what is leading to what could well be the biggest missed foreshadowing in recent history.

(more…)

Obama Eligibility: Identifying the Real Fools

Monday, May 21st, 2012

Liberals say you’re a fool and will call you all sorts of other things, if you question the birthplace of one Barack Obama or Barry Soetoro. The media won’t touch it either.

The more we learn, the more we don’t know and that IS the problem.

Pressed for years to display his birth certificate, Obama finally did 13 months ago, and under examination by the first law enforcement driven investigation into it, it comes up as a not even so clever forgery.

The same can be said for his Selective Service registration.

Now, Breitbart has uncovered that literary agents, Acton and Dystal, were publicizing a book that Obama was to have written but never did, “Journeys in Black and White,” back in 1991. In their promotion piece, Acton and Dystal stated that Obama had been “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.

(more…)

Obama’s Eligibility…Tyranny in the Making

Tuesday, April 3rd, 2012

While the Obama administration fights for all they’re worth, and that ain’t much, to prevent individual states from enacting voter ID laws, and while at the same time more and more allegations of forgery regarding Obama’s own personal records surfaces due to Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case investigation, voter fraud has taken a front seat in Indiana.

Butch Morgan, Pam Brunette, Beverly Shelton and Dustin Blythe, pictured  from left to right, have been formally charged with election fraud.

These were democratic operatives.

They worked for the democratic party in St. Joseph County, Indiana.

They forged names on petitions to place both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton on the Indiana ballot in 2008.

They split up the job…2 forging names for Obama and the other 2 forging names for Clinton.

It looks now as if between the 4, enough name were forged to place both candidates on that ballot – and what’s even more stunning is the idea that, without their efforts, it now looks as though neither Obama nor Clinton would have made the ballot.

It is unlikely we would know anything about this today were it not for Lucas Burkett. He blew the whistle. From the start, he was in on the scheme. Burkett himself forged signatures and was there, at St. Joseph County Democratic strategy meetings, where the scheme was discussed and agreed upon.

(more…)

Obama’s Eligibility…Not One Shred of Authentic Verifiable Evidence

Sunday, March 4th, 2012

In the wake of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s press conference regarding his Cold Case Posse’s investigation into Obama’s documents, we are left with some questions.

These questions are NOT new questions but they bear asking again and now, since an official law enforcement agency has finally investigated and issued a report, perhaps these questions gain in validity.

Yes, many others have raised these questions and rightfully so. The questions began nearly 4 years ago but, for the sake of sticking to the documents in question, we will confine our points to questions raised within the last year.

On April 25th 2011, Obama “released” his “official certificate of live birth” in a press conference from the white house briefing room. Nearly immediately, those who knew of such things as computers, graphics, layering and such, called into question the process employed in creating this birth certificate.

Not for a minute should their efforts be discounted in questioning the validity of it. Indeed, they set the stage for this official law enforcement investigation and without doubt, they deserve credit for their work. The difference is, while they did indeed know their stuff, they were not affiliated with an official law enforcement investigation and therefore, were ripe for ridicule, ripe for what we now KNOW was UNWARRANTED ridicule.

Now, to the questions regarding the long form birth certificate which MUST be asked, AGAIN, because of the OFFICIAL LAW ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATION, conducted by the office of Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Maricopa County Arizona.

(more…)

Why Sheriff Joe’s Finding Are SO Important

Thursday, March 1st, 2012

This afternoon, the much awaited results of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse were made known. Arpaio presented the evidence to a room full of reporters and used a multi-media presentation to show the process.

Without going into detail, the results were not all that surprising as we already suspected what we learned.

Regarding Obama’s birth certificate, the Cold Case Posse utilized forensic document experts to show HOW it was created. The document was indeed layered but, by showing a control document, the experts were able to explain how a computer scan will layer, in more than 100 layers, such a document.

Those layers are random. A computer scan will take portions of a given document randomly and layer them together until the full document is processed. A bit here, a parcel there, no rhyme no reason.

Obama’s birth certificate, on the other hand, contained only 9 layers. That, while not at all consistent with a computer scan of a document, was not the real surprise. In those 9 layers, each layer contained a perfectly logical order.

For instance, all the names were on one layer. All the dates were on one layer. All the information of any certain topic was contained in its own layer.

This simply never happens with a computer scan. In fact, according to forensic document experts, the ONLY way that happens if a human is controlling the creation of the document.

The conclusion regarding the birth certificate was that it is 100% fraudulent.

Much the same techniques and processes with a few differences created Obama’s Selective Service card. It simply did not match, in appearance or standard date stamps used in 1980 to a real, authentic Selective Service card.

The Card also was found to be 100% fraudulent.

(more…)

Eligibility May be a Bigger Issue Than Romneycare

Wednesday, February 29th, 2012

With several states now filing cases or considering the filing of cases regarding Obama’s lack of eligibility to appear on their ballots, and in the wake of the greased ruling in Georgia, the time has come to revisit the issue.

There are a good deal of conservatives who want the truth regarding Obama and they want to hold him accountable as ineligible to serve constitutionally.

There are also a good number of Republicans who want nothing whatsoever to do with this mess.

One has to wonder why.

I believe the answer may well lie in the Republican establishment.

How many times have you heard from talk radio personalities or conservative commentators on TV that the “Birther” argument is finished? He showed the birth certificate…it’s over? Words to that effect?

Too often?

Something’s wrong.

First of all, to serve as President, according to the Constitution, “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

The framers never defined “Natural Born” though they felt it important enough to alter the draft to contain it before ratification. This clearly denotes that the framers saw a difference between being a citizen and a Natural Born Citizen.

(more…)

Obama Eligibility and a Decision of Tyranny

Saturday, February 4th, 2012

With the ruling by Judge Malihi in Georgia that Obama will remain on the ballot, tyranny has been established.

How else does one describe it when the President is above the law?

A court issues a subpoena to the President which is ignored.

The court rules against a motion to dismiss.

The attorney for the defendant, Obama, states he will not participate or provide subpoenaed material.

The Georgia Secretary of State says such action will be at the attorney’s and his client’s peril.

The hearing proceeds with the only evidence and testimony presented being against the defendant.

One week later, the Judge finds in favor of the defendant.

Clearly, speculation will be forthcoming. How did this happen? Was the Judge bought? Was he threatened? Was it all fixed before the hearing ever happened?

People will want to know the background of the Judge.

I’m SURE there are some coincidences involved.

(more…)

URGENT BREAKING…OBAMA ELIGIBILITY RULING IN GEORGIA

Friday, February 3rd, 2012

URGENT BREAKING NEWS!!!

On Thursday, Feb. 2nd 2012, exactly 1 week after the court hearing in Georgia regarding Obama’s eligibility to appear on that state’s ballot for the 2012 elections, and after neither Obama nor his attorney participated in that hearing, a motion was filed by the Liberty Legal Foundation.

“…that the Superior Court find the Defendant in willful contempt of Court, and that the Superior Court impose sanctions commensurate with an act that threatens the foundations of our Constitutional Republic.”

There have over the course of our nation’s history, been several times when a President has been subpoenaed and until last week, each of those Presidents has complied with the court’s orders.

Last week, Obama and his attorney sent a clear message that Obama was above the law and need not answer to the judicial branch.

Indeed, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, sent a letter to the Georgia Secretary of State a day ahead of the hearing stating neither he nor his client would take part in the hearing. Sec. of State Kemp then warned Jablonski that the choice was his but such a course of inaction would be at Jablonski’s, and his client’s, Obama’s peril.

WE NOW HAVE A RULING FROM THE JUDGE, THE HON. MICHAEL MALIHI…

IT HAS BEEN FOUND THAT OBAMA WILL …WE REPEAT… WILL…BE ALLOWED ON THE GEORGIA BALLOT!!!!!

 

As evidence and testimony was presented last Thursday, January 26th, in a Georgia courtroom regarding Obama’s past, his birth certificate, his Social Security number, his citizenship, his having lived in two different countries at the same time and more, the centerpiece of the hearing was his status as a Natural Born Citizen.

The Constitution clearly states one must BE a Natural Born Citizen to serve as President.

The plaintiffs and their legal teams, presented a strong case against Obama’s status as such. That part of the hearing revolved around the known fact that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen and an 1875 Supreme Court opining stating that a Natural Born Citizen would need parents…PLURAL…to qualify.

That case opinion from Minor vs Happersett, has been the lynchpin of this argument.

With NO evidence or testimony whatsoever was presented in Obama’s defense, Judge Mahili HAS found Obama ELIGIBLE for the Georgia ballot!!

While we expect this ruling to be appealed…for now…Obama IS on the ballot!!

As 6 other states are now considering such action in their courts, it is unknown how this ruling will effect those cases.

FOR FULL ANALYSIS OF THE RULING, PLEASE CLICK HERE!!


 

Media Silence on Obama Eligibility Raises Questions

Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

Since my article regarding the blow-by-blow account of the Georgia hearing on Obama’s eligibility to appear on that state’s ballot, one question has surfaced more than any other. This is a question which has been posed to me via social media, email and within the nearly 600 comments on that article.

The question is a simple one and a valid one.

Why has there been no media coverage of this?

Clearly, it’s a story.

A sitting President gets subpoenaed. Story.

A sitting President’s ability to be on a state’s ballot at risk. Story.

A sitting president’s attempt to dismiss the case denied. Story.

A sitting president ignores the subpoena. Story.

A sitting President’s attorney sends letter to Georgia Sec. of State saying he won’t participate. Story.

Sec. of State says don’t participate at your own risk. Story.

Hearing takes place, witnesses testify and evidence is presented with no refute from Sitting President’s attorney. Story.

NO MEDIA COVERAGE??? Story.

First, let’s have a look at the media.

The alphabet networks, also known as the mainstream or elite media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC etc. are all in the can for Obama or in his pocket. We all know that.

Why would they all of a sudden cover a story so potentially harmful to the guy who sends shivers up their collective legs?

This is the media arm of the Obama administration after all. These are the very people who refused to vet candidate Obama and anointed him their supreme leader. They went all in. They shielded Obama during the campaign, they have provided cover during his 3 years in office, they’ve been outwardly dismissive of any mention of his eligibility, they’ve labeled any who question it as nuts, mobs, terrorists, and worse.

At this point, when it actually gains a hearing before a judge and neither Obama nor his attorney show up even under subpoena, why would they now lend credibility to it?

(more…)