The Social Reengineering of Our Justice System

Lindsey Graham, the Senator from South Carolina who went off on both the liberals in the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Republicans last week says he now launching his own investigation into the Kavanaugh matter.

Graham is not however investigating Kavanaugh…he’s investigating the liberals as to how they engineered what can best be described in the words of Kavanaugh himself, as a “search and destroy mission” against the man who I still believe will be the next United States Supreme Court Justice.

Good for Lindsey Graham…somebody needs to do what he’s doing and I hope he can find the truth.

As for why Christine Blasey Ford was chosen by liberals to be the delivery system for this “search and destroy mission,” I refer you to Diane Sori’s op-ed, The Details of the Democrats Evil Plan Exposed.

Meanwhile…

Continue reading

Vetting the Credibility of Kavanaugh’s Accuser

Be sure to Click LIKE at the bottom of this article, and share it everywhere!!

By Craig Andresen – Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

Christine Margaret Blasey Ford is, at worst a con artist, and at best, something between a useful idiot and a dancing puppet to the liberal party of socialists.

Ford, or Blasey now says via her attorneys that she will not testify under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee until a full FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh regarding her baseless allegations has been completed.

As a quick recap…Ford or Blasey has alleged that as a teenager, Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her at a house she doesn’t know who owned nor can she remember why she was at the house, on a date she doesn’t remember. She herself says she never uttered a word about it until a couples therapy session in 2012, she never filed a police report on it when the alleged assault took place some 35 or so years ago, and she has absolutely no evidence that it ever happened.

So…here’s the question…

Continue reading

A Constitutional Legacy for Decades to Come

Be sure to Click LIKE at the bottom of this article, and share it everywhere!!

By Craig Andresen – Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

Supreme Court Justice, Anthony Kennedy, is set to retire at the end of July, and liberals are tying themselves into knots at…not the prospect, but the reality…that President Trump will appoint yet another Justice to the nation’s highest court.

Liberals, already desperately searching for even one core value on which to take a stand, on which to build a platform for the 2018 midterm elections as well as for 2020 are now facing the nightmare of all liberal nightmares.

So, what is really at stake for both parties due to the looming Supreme Court nomination, and the resulting firestorm of a confirmation process?

Plenty.

First, on the Conservative side of things…

Continue reading

Our Greatest Domestic Threat is Now an Open Seat

By Craig Andresen Right Side Patriots http://www.americanpbn.com/

Suddenly, with the death of Justice Scalia, the appointment of a ninth Justice to the Supreme Court has takesup 1n on more weight than most would have previously believed necessary in this, an election year.

Just as weighty as the decision as to who should nominate our next Supreme Court Justice is how any nominee will view Constitutional theory or how that person will interpret the Constitution.

Along those lines, there are five basic theories of Constitutional interpretation. Generally, those theories are as follows: (1) the text and structure of the Constitution, (2) intentions of those who drafted, voted to propose, or voted to ratify the provision in question, (3) prior precedents (usually judicial), (4) the social, political, and economic consequences of alternative interpretations, and (5) natural law. There is general agreement that the first three of these sources are appropriate guides to interpretation, but considerable disagreement as to the relative weight that should be given to the three sources when they point in different directions. Many interpreters of the Constitution have suggested that the consequences of alternative interpretations are never relevant, even when all other considerations are evenly balanced. Natural law (higher law, God’s law) is now only infrequently suggested as an interpretive guide, even though many of the framers of the Constitution recognized its appropriateness. Persons who favor heavy reliance on originalist sources (text and intentions) are commonly called “originalists.” Persons who favor giving a more substantial weighting to precedent, consequences, or natural law are called “non-originalists.” In practice, disagreement between originalists and non-originalists often concerns whether to apply heightened judicial scrutiny to certain “fundamental rights” that are not explicitly protected in the text of the Constitution.

Continue reading

Haul Hillary In on a Gurney DAMNIT!!!

First…

She didn’t want to testify until her own “internal investigation” was complete.

Hillary wanted her own people to come up with their own facts regarding Benghazi.

“Let us complete our investigation” we were all told. Then, she said, she would have the facts.

Okay…

Next…She couldn’t testify before a congressional committee because she had…Prior plans.

A wine tasting in Australia.

Oh…But she WILL testify we were all told. They were in the process of completing their “internal investigation.”

After that, Hillary contracted a “stomach virus” which kept her at home.

Hmmmm….

Then, finally…The “internal investigation” we were all waiting for was finished but, what’s this?

Hillary fell down.

She gave herself a concussion.

She couldn’t testify because she had a concussion but…Don’t worry…She WILL testify we were all told. She will…Just as soon as she’s better.

Now…

Continue reading