Weekend Edition: NY Times – Covering (UP) Benghazi – Pt.2

In yesterday’s Weekend Edition, I outlined the desperation of last week’s New York Times attempt to provide cover by reintroducing that lame and false You Tube fabrication for the Benghazi attacks.

I also kicked down the door as to who would have HAD to be involved, why and to what ends.

I went so far as to expose the preemptive nature behind the cover story AND the actions of 8 Democrats in the house.

If you missed it…Have a look at the truly disgusting nature of those who would conspire, collude, commit and cover up acts of TREASON.

But, I said there was more and, there is.

To truly delve into the desperate nature of liberals, Obama, his administration, Hillary and the New York Times…One must fully realize how far the Times is willing to go and why.

Last week, The NY Times released an editorial regarding Benghazi and that You Tube video ass covering story stating: “Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault. The attack was led, instead, by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO’s extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi. And contrary to claims by some members of Congress, it was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam.”

The Times didn’t stop there.

Oh…SOMEBODY is TRULY desperate…

Last Thursday, they actually made a claim SO outrageous, SO absurd, that it defies common sense and DEFINES desperation.

As their latest effort at providing some sort of “reasonable” doubt for any upcoming trial of either Hillary, Obama or BOTH was falling apart due to REAL FACTS garnered from SWORN TESTIMONY provided by CIA BENGHAZI SURVIVORS behind the closed doors of the house oversight committee…

Continue reading

Weekend Edition: NY Times – Covering (UP) Benghazi – Pt.1

Last week, the New York Times garnered publicity by trying to claim that the 9-11-2012 attacks in Benghazi really WERE because of an obtuse, low budget, You Tube video that, essentially, nobody saw.

The fallout was decisive from their inopportune editorial.

Members of congress from both parties quickly derided the opinion piece as bunk, citing evidence gathered via sources under oath from house and senate hearings that pointed directly toward al Qaeda and their affiliate, Ansar al Sharia…al Qaeda by another name.

Many called the NYT piece what it was.

Cover for Hillary’s 2016 ambitions but…

I contend there is more to it than that.

Much more to it than that.

Before I delve into what that much more is, we need to take a quick look at the claims made in the Times.

First…

Here is the direct quote from David D. Kirkpatrick of the Times in that piece:

Continue reading

Barack HUSSEIN Obama – Islam’s TROJAN HORSE!!!

When you look at a number of Obama quotes, there are some things that should come as no surprise.

 “We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world — including in my own country.”

“Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance.”

“These rituals remind us of the principles that we hold in common, and Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings.”

“I made clear that America is not – and never will be – at war with Islam.”

“Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism – it is an important part of promoting peace.”

Need I continue?

Yes…I believe, to make the point crystal clear…I do.

“That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn’t. And I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.”

“Throughout history, Islam has demonstrated through words and deeds the possibilities of religious tolerance and racial equality.”

“Ramadan is a celebration of a faith known for great diversity and racial equality”

Are you starting to get the picture?

Maybe THESE quotes will help…

Continue reading

Benghazi: Witnesses to Treason Set to Testify

To be completely candid, there aren’t very many Members of Congress that I, or anyone for that matter, trust but, Trey Gowdy is one of the handful I would trust 24/7 365.

Gowdy is an exceptional representative to his constituents and were all congressmen and women the caliber of Trey Gowdy, this nation would be in fine shape.

According to Gowdy, the Obama administration has been changing the names…Providing aliases, to the survivors of Benghazi.

Gowdy would not make such a claim were there no evidence to back it up.

Gowdy recently told The Blaze: “Stop and think what things are most calculated to get at the truth? Talk to people with first-hand knowledge. What creates the appearance and perhaps the reality of a cover-up? Not letting us talk with people who have the most amount of information, dispersing them around the country and changing their names.”

Indeed, Trey Gowdy has questions, lots of them, for the long hidden away Benghazi survivors but, he has a few rather common sense questions for the media as well.

“Does it bother you whether or not you know why Chris Stevens was in Benghazi?”

“Do you know why we were the last flag flying in Benghazi after the British had left and the Red Cross had been bombed? Do you know why requests for additional security were denied?”

Those survivors, most of them CIA agents who were on the ground IN Benghazi nearly 15 months ago have reportedly been threatened by the Obama administration including the CIA, the Justice Department and the State Department.

According to white house court jester, Jay Carney:

Continue reading

Weekend Edition: Benghazi – 4 Heroes and 15 Cowards

Of all the despicable things.

Of all the unfeeling and undeniably Un-American things…What took place, last Thursday in the House Oversight Committee was both inexplicable and unconscionable.

As the Father of Tyrone Woods and the mother of Sean Smith came before the committee, 15 of the 17 democrats on the committee…GOT UP AND WALKED OUT OF THE ROOM!!!

That’s right…as 2 of the parents of the 4 Americans murdered in the terrorist attacks in Benghazi came to the table to speak and pose their concerns…

All but 2 of the democrats on the committee…stood and walked out of the room.

 HOW DARE THEY!!!!!

It was an act so cold and so callous as to usually be reserved for thugs, street criminals and the world’s despots who routinely ignore the plight of their victims and I’m not at all sure the 15 fleeing liberals last Thursday don’t fit neatly into that subhuman conglomeration of filth.

There is no need to try and imagine it.

It happened.

15 representatives of the people, stood and walked out when 2 citizens, thrust into the spotlight by circumstances well beyond their control, approached the committee to testify.

Here is a list of those democrats and, by clicking on each name, you can find their contact information.

Continue reading

Obama Is Giving Your 2nd Amendment Rights to Terrorists

Let’s have a look at the pattern of behavior regarding our 2nd Amendment presented by the Obama administration for a moment.

We know these things are happening, that they are consistent and that the list of them continues to grow but, sometimes, until we see it in writing, the overall danger of the pattern is dismissed.

It shouldn’t be.

To fully understand the Obama concept of our 2nd Amendment, one needs to go back to the beginning.

In this case, the beginning is when Obama was a “professor” at the university of Chicago teaching, of all things, Constitutional Law to young and impressionable, government school indoctrinated youth.

That is where economist, then a professor himself and now author, John R. Lott Jr. met Barack Hussein Obama.

In his book, “At the Brink” in the 3rd chapter, Lott tells of when he and Obama had a discussion regarding guns and the 2nd Amendment.

What, according to Lott, Obama said was stunning and important to his current stance on guns.

Said Obama…

Continue reading

Obama – You Don’t Have the Right to Lecture US on Moral Obligations

How’s that again?

Seriously…Did Obama REALLY say that???

“I think we have both a moral obligation and a national security interest in both a) ending the slaughter in Syria and b) ensuring a stable Syria.”

Yes.

That is exactly what he said.

So…NOW he wants to talk about “MORAL OBLIGATIONS???”

Okay…

Let’s talk about “MORAL OBLIGATIONS.”

HILLARY CLINTON had a “MORAL OBLIGATION” to ensure that our diplomats were protected in Libya.

Under HER “leadership,” no doubt guided by her “MORAL OBLIGATIONS,” our security personnel in Libya, specifically Benghazi, were drawn DOWN.

Under her “MORAL OBLIGATION” to ensure their safety…

Continue reading

Weekend Edition: Dear Nobel Peace Prize Committee

Dear Nobel Peace Prize Committee,

It is well past the time for you to admit you made a mistake.

On October 9th, 2009, you gave one of your “PEACE” prizes to one Barack Hussein Obama and cited…

Obama’s “promotion of nuclear nonproliferation” and a “new climate” in international relations fostered by Obama, especially in reaching out to the Muslim world,” In doing so.

Even an organization as suspect as yours must now accept that this was a large crock of crap.

Outside of the despots in Iran and North Korea, who ISN’T for nuclear nonproliferation?

Seriously…WHO???

If that was a valid reason for giving someone a medal you would be turning those things out like Hershey’s cranks out Kisses.

And this…”OUTREACH TO THE MUSLIM WORLD” might be one of the most LUDACRIS things ever imagined.

Have you dunderheads noticed what’s going ON in that world???

The MUSLIMS dislike us more NOW than they did when you put Obama on a pedestal.

THEY HATE US.

Not only that but…Just look at the things your “PEACE” prize winner has been doing.

For instance…

Continue reading

DICTATORS Don’t NEED the CONSENT OF CONGRESS

In a not at all surprising move yesterday, Russia and China, both vitriolic supporters of Assad, got up and walked OUT of a U.N. Security Council meeting regarding Syria and the impending military strike Obama is desperate to make.

They WALKED OUT.

Their position is clear and that’s not good news for the U.N. puppet, Obama.

He will NOT have the authorization of his beloved union of despots, thugs and thieves to launch attacks on Syria but…Will he have the authorization of his own CONGRESS?

Ahhhhh…That is the question.

Obama and HIS regime say that the impending strikes are not about regime change in SYRIA.

NOT ABOUT REGIME CHANGE IN SYRIA.

He HAS to make that claim, for doing otherwise, would be announcing his transparent support of al Qaeda and other terrorist entities in yet another sovereign nation.

He did it in Libya and covered it up.

He did it in Egypt and cloaked it in a “democratic election.”

He did it in Iraq and Afghanistan by announcing our retreat.

He did it in Iran by NOT interfering when pro-democracy protesters were massacred there.

Now, by aiding and trying to supply al Qaeda, Ansar al-Sharia and other such ilk in Syria, he intends to assist those terrorist groups by striking Syria with Tomahawk cruise missiles.

Obama wants to attack…

Continue reading

Obama – On the Verge of Starting WW3

For the last couple of days, I have outlined, here in The National Patriot, the foreign policy of this Obama regime related to Syria and I have tied in Benghazi, Gaddafi, Egypt and offered evidence that the WMD attacks in Syria were carried out by Syrian “rebels.”

I have also stated that ISRAEL is directly in the crosshairs.

Allow me to now expand on that scenario.

It is only a matter of time now, with more than 360 cruise missiles aboard U.S. warships, before Obama pulls the trigger.

There is something very, VERY important you should know.

The WMD inside of Syria, the components of which were most likely delivered to them by Saddam in the weeks leading to the war in 2003, can NOT…Let me repeat that for clarity…

CAN NOT be destroyed by missile strikes.

Obama can rain HELL on Syria with missile attacks but, he can NOT destroy the WMD as most of it is kept underground and, any strike ON it would SPREAD it.

Now…Consider that the WMD that has been used, has been used by the “REBELS” rather than by ASSAD and you will start taking in the bigger picture.

WHO ARE THE REBELS???

Continue reading