Posts Tagged ‘ambassador stevens’

Obama…Islam’s Dancing Puppet

Wednesday, October 15th, 2014

is 1Let’s connect the dots and reveal the truth that no liberal wants YOU to know.

Just a few months ago, on June 23rd, 2014 as I outlined in a National Patriot article, Bush Was Right – Saddam Had WMD ISIS had overrun and captured Al Muthanna…the Saddam Hussein chemical stockpile in Iraq…the very chemical weapons liberals far and wide have claimed never existed.

In that article, I stated two VERY important things.

First: “Muthanna is, in fact, where Saddam Hussein manufactured and stored…WMD and is now believed to be where the gas he used against the Kurds came from.”

And Second: “ …if they can find a way to transport the sarin, the VX and the mustard gas stored there, if they can find a way to disperse it in populated areas…the horrors we’ve seen over the past two weeks perpetrated by ISIS will pale by comparison.”

ISIS…the marauding 7th century barbarians have now used 21st century weapons of mass destruction against the Kurds in the Syrian city of Kobani and if you think they will stop at that…

(more…)

Benghazi: The Truth Exposed…Parts 1, 2 and 3

Sunday, May 11th, 2014

 

Benghazi: The Truth Exposed – Part 1

By Craig Andresen on April 7, 2014 at 9:06 pm

TRUTH 1For the next two days, My Right Side Patriot’s radio partner, Diane Sori and I have combined our efforts to bring you the latest and most stunning coverage of the Benghazi cover up you will read anywhere.

Today, we have written separate articles with mine outlining what transpired before the attacks and Diane’s, regarding what transpired DURING those attacks.

If you think you already know the whole story…You don’t and, what you DON’T know is likely to light your hair on fire.

On January 15th, 2014, the Senate Select Committee on intelligence review of the Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Facilities in Benghazi was released to the public.

Naturally, you read that report.

You didn’t?

Well, surely you heard all the details of it on the news.

You heard that the Benghazi attacks could have been prevented. That’s what you heard on the news. In fact, that’s about ALL you heard on the news because, mainstream media and, in this case, even Fox news didn’t give the report the coverage they should have.

There’s a lot more, a WHOLE lot more in that report than, “It could have been prevented.”

For instance…

(more…)

Is Benghazi a Made Up Scandal? Skyes the Limit

Thursday, May 8th, 2014

skyes 1As liberals continue to run scared regarding the truth about the Benghazi attacks, more and more rhetoric from them is flying hither and yawn through social media and their lapdog mainstream media. It’s now to the point that we need to fight back using the facts.

A couple of days ago, I wrote an article,Liberal Benghazi Deniers About to Face the Music that received scorn from the left and I fully expected it would but their counter arguments simply fly in the face of reality.

Wrote Chad Skyes in a comment posted on my article: “First off, I’m 100%, no. I’m 110% positive, that no administration official even knew what had happened in Benghazi for weeks afterwards. The sheer amount of confusion when something like this happens is overwhelming. Even when actual combat units are engaged in a firefight, with all our communications equipment, the information received by higher ups is almost always incorrect and inconsistent. The fog of war is very thick and unless you’ve been there like I have.. your opinions are worthless. “

“What followed politically was your typical PR campaign. It wouldn’t have mattered who was in office, Republicans, Democrats, none of that matters. The PR machine does it’s thing regardless of who is in power. We can point to complacency, mismanagement, lack of funding, lack of security, blow back from our foreign policy. We could go on and on pointing the finger.. the reality is war is hell and people die.. period. “

“Instead of wasting tax payer dollars on this made up scandal, why are we not focusing on the REAL SCANDALS??”

Mr. Skyes is 100%, no…

(more…)

Benghazi: The Truth Exposed…Part 3 of 3

Wednesday, April 9th, 2014

Article Co-Written by Craig Andresen and Diane Sori

After the attacks in Benghazi many questions remained that needed answers even after the Johnny-come-lately FBI investigation said all hadbenghazi 1 been answered, and those who wanted to protect the Obama regime by refusing to answer them was in full operational mode. The Rose Garden speech blaming the video…Obama jetting off to Vegas for a fund raiser…Susan Rice spreading the video nonsense on five Sunday shows…Hillary and Obama blaming the video at the memorial service as the caskets of Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, and Glen Doherty arrived…and more of Obama’s blathering on about the video ruse at the U(seless) N(ations). We do NOT need to go into details with which everyone is already all too familiar. What we must do however, is connect the most disturbing of dots. Let’s begin with the ‘stand down’ orders.

Issuing a ‘stand down’ order does follow a specific chain of command, and the one relating to Benghazi would go like this, in order from top to bottom…President, Secretary of Defense, Secretary’s of the various armed services (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines), Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the various Chiefs of Staff for each military service, the Commanding General for AFRICOM, and the local command structure under AFRICOM.

All in the command chain below Obama have denied giving such an order, including then Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta and Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (remember, Dempsey testified that orders were given to assist in Tripoli but NOT to assist in Benghazi but NEVER telling who gave that order but we know it was NOT him). And all the military branch Chiefs have also said they gave NO such order. And while AFRICOM Commander General Carter Ham did give testimony in a closed door hearing before the House Armed Services Committee investigating Benghazi, we still do NOT know his testimony, but know that if he had given such an order it would have been made public for all to hear for it would have cleared Obama, especially important because everything possible is being done to try and distance him from this event, especially after his nonsense about a YouTube video.

But NO such announcement assuming responsibility for that ‘stand down’ order has been made by General Ham so logic would dictate he gave NO such order. And remember, Panetta announced back in October 2012, that General Ham would be retiring for refusing to obey orders NOT to assist the US personnel in Benghazi on that fateful night, and that on Saturday, October 27th, Panetta confirmed that General Ham had indeed been ‘relieved’ of his AFRICOM command.

Now here is something interesting about the official command chain…neither the Vice-President nor the Secretary of State is in that chain. But, the Vice-President and the Secretary of State do have the authority through the President to countermand any one below the President. And while the National Security Council and the Department of Homeland Security Secretary influence military decisions (to some degree) through the National Security Act and through their advisory positions to the President, they do NOT have the authority to issue an actual ‘stand down’ order on their own as that can ONLY be done by those in the direct chain of command.

Yet according to whistleblower Gregory Hicks (the Deputy Chief of Mission in Libya at the time of Benghazi), who when testifying before Congress said that after the first attack a security team left Tripoli for Benghazi with two military personnel, and that four members of a special forces team in Tripoli wanted to go in a second wave but were ordered to ‘stand down’ (but he did NOT know who gave that order).

And remember…

(more…)

Benghazi: The Truth Exposed – Part 1

Monday, April 7th, 2014

TRUTH 1For the next two days, My Right Side Patriot’s radio partner, Diane Sori and I have combined our efforts to bring you the latest and most stunning coverage of the Benghazi cover up you will read anywhere.

Today, we have written separate articles with mine outlining what transpired before the attacks and Diane’s, regarding what transpired DURING those attacks.

If you think you already know the whole story…You don’t and, what you DON’T know is likely to light your hair on fire.

On January 15th, 2014, the Senate Select Committee on intelligence review of the Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Facilities in Benghazi was released to the public.

Naturally, you read that report.

You didn’t?

Well, surely you heard all the details of it on the news.

You heard that the Benghazi attacks could have been prevented. That’s what you heard on the news. In fact, that’s about ALL you heard on the news because, mainstream media and, in this case, even Fox news didn’t give the report the coverage they should have.

There’s a lot more, a WHOLE lot more in that report than, “It could have been prevented.”

For instance…

Were you aware that the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence spoke with General Petraeus not once, not twice but, 3 times and one of those times was when the General was still the head of the CIA?

That is a fact that will become more important when you see how it ties in with the rest of this series later on.

 The committee also spoke with the CIA Chief of Base Benghazi who was there on the night of the attacks, a fact made even more important given last week’s testimony from Michael Morrell, the then Deputy Director of the CIA who admitted that the unnamed Chief of Base Benghazi emailed him, just 4 days after the attacks to tell Morrell, in no uncertain terms that the attacks were NOT part of some protest over a You Tube video but were, in fact, a TERRORIST attack.

Were you aware…

(more…)

Benghazi: The Truth Exposed…Part 2

Monday, April 7th, 2014

By: Diane Sori

My RIGHT SIDE PATRIOT partner and owner of The National Patriot, Craig Andresen, and I have teamed up to expose the truth about Benghazi…the truth the media…including FOX News…will NOT tell you. And as they say, ‘the devil is in the details’…and those details can be found buried within the entirety of ‘The U.S. Senate Select Committee on INTELLIGENCE REVIEW of the Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Facilities in Benghazi’ and NOT within the abbreviated version the media ‘sold’ to the public.

These details are so critical and so ignored that Craig and I are doing a three-part series running today and tomorrow in our respective blogs and on Facebook leading up to our RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS radio show this Wednesday at 2pm. Comprising our full second hour starting at 3pm, Craig and I will break down our finds into even more details…details and facts Obama and Hillary need to be kept hidden for fear that both a Constitutional crisis and their respective arrests might be in the making. Please visit Craig’s blog thenationalpatriot.com first (Part 1) as he exposes the events leading up to Benghazi.

And now I will pick-up where Craig’s article leaves off…

When foreign diplomats sense their lives are in danger they try to send paper ‘classified documents’ to ‘safe’ places or they destroy those documents which could fall into enemy hands. And if choosing to smuggle documents out they do NOT send them to just one person…they send copies of said documents to many…either couriering them out via a trusted person or most likely in Stevens’ case sending the computer files through the internet and e-mails to those they trust.  I would safely guess that’s what Stevens did, for being the consummate professional he was known to be, he probably documented everything (I believe) he suspected about Obama’s involvement in the guns and weapons running operation, and sent it to those he trusted as the events in Benghazi and around the area started to heat up. And most likely Stevens’ actions and his suppositions were discovered by Obama’s and Hillary’s people, and thus he was marked for a ‘targeted kill’ to silence him, because the presidential election was coming up and Obama could NOT afford any bad press.Sadly, Smith, Woods, and Doherty were mere collateral damage.

Senate Report on Benghazi – SOFT-SELLING TREASON

Thursday, January 16th, 2014

Yesterday, an 85 page “report” said to be “comprehensive” was released by the Senate “Intelligence” Committee regarding the September 11th, 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi.

I am livid.

Not only is this report far from “comprehensive,” I submit it lacks intelligence and moreover, comments made regarding it by the lead Republican on that committee show a mind-numbing lack of desire to truly get to the bottom of the attacks and hold those truly responsible to account.

Saxby Chambliss, the ranking Republican on that senate committee said of the report that it provides, “needed and deserved answers.”

BULLCRAP senator…BULLCRAP.

It answers nothing as those responsible FOR those terrorist attacks have yet to answer for ANY of their actions.

I’ll get back to that…TRUST ME!!!

Secondly…

(more…)

Benghazi: Witnesses to Treason Set to Testify

Wednesday, November 6th, 2013

To be completely candid, there aren’t very many Members of Congress that I, or anyone for that matter, trust but, Trey Gowdy is one of the handful I would trust 24/7 365.

Gowdy is an exceptional representative to his constituents and were all congressmen and women the caliber of Trey Gowdy, this nation would be in fine shape.

According to Gowdy, the Obama administration has been changing the names…Providing aliases, to the survivors of Benghazi.

Gowdy would not make such a claim were there no evidence to back it up.

Gowdy recently told The Blaze: “Stop and think what things are most calculated to get at the truth? Talk to people with first-hand knowledge. What creates the appearance and perhaps the reality of a cover-up? Not letting us talk with people who have the most amount of information, dispersing them around the country and changing their names.”

Indeed, Trey Gowdy has questions, lots of them, for the long hidden away Benghazi survivors but, he has a few rather common sense questions for the media as well.

“Does it bother you whether or not you know why Chris Stevens was in Benghazi?”

“Do you know why we were the last flag flying in Benghazi after the British had left and the Red Cross had been bombed? Do you know why requests for additional security were denied?”

Those survivors, most of them CIA agents who were on the ground IN Benghazi nearly 15 months ago have reportedly been threatened by the Obama administration including the CIA, the Justice Department and the State Department.

According to white house court jester, Jay Carney:

(more…)

Aiding and Abetting al Qaeda in Sryia is TREASON!!!

Tuesday, September 10th, 2013

Today is September 10th.

Or, to be more precise…9/11 eve.

On the eve of the day we were attacked by al Qaeda, not once but TWICE, I find it beyond disgraceful that our current occupier of the oval office is trying to gin up SUPPORT for bombing Syria and, thus ASSISTING…

AL QAEDA!!!

We are at war with al Qaeda.

Al Qaeda is our enemy.

Obama is trying, in desperation, to find enough votes from congress to launch an attack on Syria to aid and abet al Qaeda in taking control of yet another country.

It is, in no uncertain terms…

TREASON.

Obama says it will not be another Iraq or another Afghanistan.

Is he sure?

I’ll tell you what it WILL be…

It will be the same situation as it was the last time our government interfered in another country’s civil war.

It will be another VIETNAM.

Has John McCain slipped so far that HE doesn’t remember VIETNAM???

He was held captive there for more than 5 years. He was tortured there.

To this day, McCain is unable to raise his arms above his chest because of his injuries and yet, there is John McCain, willing to start the NEXT Vietnam…

(more…)

Obama on Syria – Too Complex for Mere Mortals

Wednesday, June 19th, 2013

Where liberty is concerned, America has a moral directive to help emerging nations and movements to achieve it.

That’s who we are.

It’s what we are.

But an internal struggle for power, where no liberty is in the offing regardless of which side is ultimately seated?

That is none of our damned business.

Syria, as it has been, under Assad, is a threat to our allies in the region.

Syria as it would be, under Islamic radicalism at the hands of those who would replace Assad…al Qaeda…The Muslim Brotherhood…Ansar al-Sharia…would STILL be a threat to our allies in the region.

While we can and should offer humanitarian assistance to those displaced by the civil war in Syria, where we can and to the extent that we can…Getting involved in the fight, via arms shipments to the “rebels,” is a foolish thing indeed.

There is no moral high ground there.

Arming the “rebels” who are al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations, with who we are currently at war in other theaters, is treason and…

(more…)