A Verdict Desperately Searching For a Crime

Be sure to Click LIKE at the bottom of this article, and share it everywhere!!

By Craig Andresen – Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

First off, allow me to state the simply obvious…democrats have lost their socialist collective minds. There’s not a contained democrat or liberal marble to be found, the cheese has slipped from their crackers, they’re crazier than soup sandwiches…

And nuttier than a port­a ­potty at a peanut festival.

Democrats are so desperate to alter the results of the 2016 election before we get to the 2020 election, that they no longer give a happy damn that they’re acting like idiots who claim to be invisible.

While I’m not exactly sure from either a scientific, or medical standpoint what their affliction is called, I am willing to bet it’s really hard to pronounce.

Democrats are insisting that President Trump must be impeached, that much is clear by the amount of bellowing and bloviating they’re engaged in 24/7, but what neither we, nor they can quite figure out is…

Why?

Okay, let’s be honest, we know why they’re running about like turpentined cats…because they lost the 2016 election…as Conservatives and Republicans, we get that…but on what basis are they actually trying to impeach President Trump? It’s a valid question, because our Constitution includes the possibility of doing such a thing, but while that founding document mentions “high crimes and misdemeanors,” it really doesn’t tell us what those are, nor does it give us a step by step procedure for impeachment.

What we do know, for sure, is that to be impeached, a President first has to have committed such, but I’m sorry liberals and democrats, winning an election is neither a high crime, nor a misdemeanor.

What we have here is a verdict desperately searching for a crime. Democrats, completely incapacitated by their abject hatred of a president who loves this country, and whose policies are actually making America great again, raising America from the ashes of the Obama regime, have pronounced President Trump GUILTY…but they just can’t come up with the high crime or misdemeanor that he’s guilty of…because they know he hasn’t committed such.

This coupcoup coup attempt started out being about supposed quid pro quo from a complaint filed by an unnamed “whistleblower” who we have all since learned, is Eric Cairamella, and supposedly stemmed from a phone call between our President Trump, and President Zelensky of Ukraine. But President Trump released the transcript of that phone call…and lo and behold…no quid pro quo. Add to that a couple of other pertinent facts…including that nobody in the Ukrainian government even knew that aid dollars had been delayed…that those aid dollars had been released and sent to Ukraine before the phone call was ever made, and that President Zelensky himself has stated that he never felt pressured to open an investigation into the Hunter and/or Joe Biden/Burisma situation.

Obviously, there was no quid pro quo…but democrats weren’t ready to pack it in, and Adam Schiff told us all…told the whole world that we would soon hear from the “whistleblower.” In fact, Schiff, in September, was running amok, and running his mouth about presenting the “whistleblower” in a public forum because that “whistleblower” had the goods on Trump and quid pro quo.

That all came to an abrupt halt on the day we all learned that well before the “whistleblower” filed the complaint, Schiff’s office was coordinating WITH the “whistleblower,” and by the looks of the complaint, it’s quite possible that said complaint was written BY Adam Schiff. All of a sudden, the line changed from “You’ll hear from the “whistleblower” soon,” to “we don’t see any reason to bring the “whistleblower” in to testify.”

There’s a really good reason for that…because if Schiff has the “whistleblower” testify, Schiff HIMSELF will have to testify as a fact witness, and that would blow the democrat’s impeachment of President Trump hopes to smithereens.

So, democrats still had a verdict desperately searching for a crime, and they started holding auditions in the basement of the Capitol, behind closed doors, in the search for actors they could put on the public stage. That too became transparently bogus when they, the democrats couldn’t find “witnesses” who actually “witnessed” anything, and the reason they couldn’t find a “witness” who “witnessed” anything is because there was no crime to have “witnessed” to begin with.

Finally, Schiff moved the whole absurd sham from closed door, secret basement meetings to public hearings having finally cast his, and the democrat’s stage production of “Death of a Political Party,” and last week, he trotted out his first three star-chamber “witnesses,” who didn’t “witness” a damn thing. All three proved to be disasters for Schiff and the democrats, as all three had to admit that they had no firsthand knowledge of the phone call…had no knowledge of the supposed quid pro quo, and none of them could point to any crime committed by President Trump.

But there sat Ambassador William Taylor who, behind those closed basement doors, told the directors of the stage production that he “had a clear understanding” that the quid pro quo took place. A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING, which he claimed to have gotten from another auditionee, E.U. Ambassador Gordon Sondland, who at first claimed he didn’t know about any quid pro whatever, and then later remembered that he did…so from where exactly did Taylor’s “clear understanding” come, and exactly how close was Taylor to having actually “witnessed” anything? How close…exactly…was Taylor, the very first star-chamber witness to first-hand knowledge of the supposed high crime or misdemeanor?

Here is the statement from Sondland, from which Taylor claims he got “clear understanding,” and shows in glaring truth just how close Schiff’s best “witness” was to any first-hand knowledge: “Ambassador Taylor recalls that Mr. Morrison told Ambassador Taylor that I told Mr. Morrison that I had conveyed this message to Mr. Yermak on September 1, 2019, in connection with Vice President Pence’s visit to Warsaw and a meeting with President Zelensky.”

That was last Wednesday, and having presented two so-called witnesses who witnessed nothing, including one who gained “clear understanding” of the manufactured quid pro quo from something harder to follow than a hillbilly family tree, Schiff abruptly changed the desperately searched for crime from quid pro quo to…bribery…on Thursday.

The problem for Schiff, and the democrats was…there was no bribery either, and to highlight that point, before last Friday’s “witness,” Marie Yavonovitch took center stage, President Trump released the transcript of his FIRST phone call with President Zelensky in which there was no mention of either quid bla bla bla OR bribery which left Schiff and the democrats scrambling to find some OTHER manufactured high crime or misdemeanor.

To THAT end, with Yavanovitch at center stage, Schiff and his band of fellow desperate scammers tried to make the crime out to be the removal of Yavonovitch from her post as the Ambassador to Ukraine. She whined, and tried to act dismayed, confused, and distraught over her removal from the post…and democrats in the hearing tried their best to act incredulous over her removal…but the Republicans in that hearing were having none of it.

Yavanovitch had been removed from her post MONTHS before the benign phone call in question, and she had to admit that under oath. She also had to admit to several other things that destroyed the fraudulent narrative of Schiff and the democrats, like…she’s still employed by the State Department, she’s got a plumb job at Georgetown University that she likes, that she’s still highly regarded by her colleagues, that she didn’t suffer any cut in pay, and that the President has every right to remove any Ambassador the president wants to remove, for any reason.

But that’s not all she had to admit to under oath…Yavonovitch also had to admit that she had no knowledge of any crime committed by President Trump, and that was huge because Schiff and the democrats put her in that seat, in a hearing as a witness to supposedly prove that President Trump had committed a high crime or a misdemeanor.

Was it a crime for Trump to remove her from her post? No…but if were a crime…let’s all remember that Obama removed each and every Bush appointed Ambassador from their posts and democrats failed to utter one peep of indignation over that.

But in the middle of the Yavonovitch testimony, President Trump fired off a tweet regarding her poor performance everywhere she held a diplomatic post, and blinded by his abject hatred of President Trump, Adam Schiff read that tweet into the official record in real time…which then saw Schiff and his fellow idiots try to spin the tweet into the high crime or misdemeanor, claiming it to be intimidation of a witness.

There was no more intimidation in that tweet, then there was quid pro quo in the phone call, or bribery, or anything else that democrats are trying to manufacture into a high crime…and they know it…but they also know that their impeachment hearings are going up in flames faster than the Hindenburg, and their hopes of a coup are sinking faster than the Titanic.

Their “witnesses” haven’t “witnessed” anything, none of them can point out any crime committed by President Trump, and they’ve got a “whistleblower” that colluded with their committee Chairman, but that collusion isn’t the only reason Schiff won’t put Ciaramella in the seat as a “witness.” Remember, one of Ciaramella’s attorneys, Mark Zaid, sent an email or a tweet in January, 2017…the month of Trump’s inauguration…that read,  a “coup has started” and that “impeachment will follow ultimately.”

That would put the timeline of how far back this particular coup attempt really goes, and it would also force into the light of day other key potential witnesses who have played a part in this, as well as the manufactured Russian collusion debacle…people like Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Mueller, Strozk and Page, the Bidens…Joe and Hunter and quite possibly even Obama and Hillary…all of whom would be called as witnesses by Republicans in the Senate if this ever gets as far as an impeachment trial there, because in the Senate, Republicans make the rules…not the democrats.

And let’s not forget what else Ciaramella’s shyster attorney, Mark Zaid, also tweeted, “I predict @CNN will play a key role in @realDonaldTrump not finishing out his full term as president. We will get rid of him, and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters.” The Republicans in the Senate could have a field day with that, showing today’s mainstream media to be every bit the enemies of the people President Trump has claimed them to be, as they have taken an active, and willing role in an attempted coup.

And at the head of all of this, is a confirmed liar, Adam Schiff who in last Wednesday’s public hearing claimed that he doesn’t know the name of the “whistleblower.” How is that even possible when it was Schiff himself who has threatened Republicans with charges of ethics violations should THEY reveal the name of the “whistleblower,” a name Schiff himself now claims he doesn’t know.

Schiff, and the democrats, who hold the majority in the House, have by their own ill design, blinded by their hatred of President Trump, those who elected him, and this country have set themselves up as roadkill. They have become the proverbial squirrel that jumps off the curb and starts to run across the street, then changes its mind, starts back to the near curb, and then reverses course before getting flattened in the middle of the street.

And guess what…come January, when he is no longer prevented from being part of President Trump’s defense team, and at about the time this would end up in the Senate if it is allowed to get that far…

It’ll be Trey Gowdy driving the car.

Copyright © Craig Andresen/thenationalpatriot.com 2019/ All rights reserved

*************************************************************************************************
For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Diane Sori’s blog The Patriot Factor to read her latest article, Impeachment…Change the Channel…Puleeze!

*********************************************************************************************** 

RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS…LIVE!

Tomorrow, Tuesday, November 19th, from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss ‘Impeachment…Change the Channel…Puleeze!’; ‘A Verdict Desperately Searching For a Crime’; and important news of the day.

Hope you can tune in at: http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political-Radio#history…or on Tune-In at:https://tunein.com/radio/American-Political-Radio-s273246/

4 thoughts on “A Verdict Desperately Searching For a Crime

  1. Well written. I wish this witch hunt would be over before elections. I did see a Demonrats who was sick of the liberal crap and became a Republican. Good work Demonrats.

  2. Step right up, folks and find the pea hiding under the walnut shell. Step right up, it’s so easy even a child could do this simple trick….shuffle, shuffle, shuffle. Okay, now where is the little green pea???? Walnut #1–no just the nut shell. Walnut #2..no just the nut shell? Walnut #3..no just the nut shell. Where did the little green pea go???? THERE NEVER WAS A LITTLE GREEN PEA!!!!! JUST THREE EMPTY WALNUT SHELLS!!!!!! LOVING THIS!!!!!!

Comments are closed.