The Social Reengineering of Our Justice System

Lindsey Graham, the Senator from South Carolina who went off on both the liberals in the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Republicans last week says he now launching his own investigation into the Kavanaugh matter.

Graham is not however investigating Kavanaugh…he’s investigating the liberals as to how they engineered what can best be described in the words of Kavanaugh himself, as a “search and destroy mission” against the man who I still believe will be the next United States Supreme Court Justice.

Good for Lindsey Graham…somebody needs to do what he’s doing and I hope he can find the truth.

As for why Christine Blasey Ford was chosen by liberals to be the delivery system for this “search and destroy mission,” I refer you to Diane Sori’s op-ed, The Details of the Democrats Evil Plan Exposed.


I believe a hard look at the ramifications of the liberal “search and destroy mission” need to be examined going forward…but before we can look forward, we must first have a look in the rear view mirror.

When it comes to Kavanaugh’s accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, one by one last week, Republicans from the Judiciary Committee all the way up to and including President Trump issued a standardized talking point…”while something may have happened to Dr. Ford at some time in her life, and while we must take her allegations seriously as all victims must be heard, we do not believe Judge Kavanaugh did what he is accused of doing.”

Bear in mind that such a talking point was crafted so as to not inflame the terminally inflamed…so as to not trigger the terminally triggered…in other words, to cater to feminists with a sense of political correctness.

Screw that crap.

Going forward, there will be ramifications of what I consider to be bogus, “feeling” driven allegations…everybody will automatically be expected to “believe” baseless, evidence-free allegations when they are made by a woman…no matter what.

Let’s get into the “why” of all of this.

The odds on favorite reason for why liberals are on this “search and destroy mission” from social media to the mainstream media to the “we believe the survivor” chanting protesters is Roe v. Wade.

That’s a crock of crap because, while the liberals protesting Kavanaugh can easily be stupid enough to think that a single member of the SCOTUS can simply overturn Roe V. Wade…those who cooked up this “search and destroy mission” are not your garden variety, easily manipulated liberals…they are the liberals who engineer the manipulation.

The real reason for the “search and destroy mission” isn’t even a mission against Judge Brett Kavanaugh…it goes much, much deeper than that. What we are witnessing here is a mission to destroy one of the most fundamental principles of America…the “presumption of innocence” orthe notion that one is innocent until proven guilty.

The Supreme Court decision in Coffin v. The United States in 1895 established “presumption of innocence” as the law. The ruling in Coffin v. The United States begins with these words: “The principle that there is a presumption of innocence in favor of the accused is the undoubted law, axiomatic and elementary, and its enforcement lies at the foundation of the administration of our criminal law …”

The liberals who engineered this “search and destroy mission” know full well that if they can, through social engineering, fundamentally transform the notion that one is innocent until proven guilty into one being presumed guilty unless that person can prove his or her innocence, they will have fundamentally transformed America.

This isn’t about Roe v. Wade…this is about using the liberal tactic of social engineering to fundamentally transform our judicial system to the point where it would no longer matter who is in control…the Republicans or the liberals…because simple, baseless accusations would determine who gets seated not only at the level of the Supreme Court, but on any federal, state or county level bench as well.

If the nominee to a bench isn’t of the liking of the deep state liberals…they will Kavanaugh that nominee…and if that nominee can’t prove their innocence, that nominee will never sit on the bench. Where liberals control the process of nominating and confirming judges at any level, only liberal activist judges who will legislate social engineering from the bench will be seated, but where Conservatives control the process, any Constitutional or Originalist judge they nominate will be Kavanaughed.

If you think about it, this tactic is the perfect fit for the liberal social engineering that is indoctrinating our children from the moment they enter kindergarten until they leave college.

And what exactly is the definition of social engineering?

  1. the use of centralized planning in an attempt to manage social change and regulate the future development and behavior of a society.

“the country’s unique blend of open economics, authoritarian politics, and social engineering”

  1. the use of deception to manipulate individuals into divulging confidential or personal information that may be used for fraudulent purposes.

Consider this…the same people that are protesting against Judge Kavanaugh, and claiming that he is unfit…are the same people who, because of liberal social engineering, have no problem with allowing a full grown man who claims to “feel” like a woman using the same public bathroom, at the same time as young girls.

I’m talking about the very same people who are engaging social engineering to add anywhere from a  3rd to an 81st gender to medical records and birth certificates…and the same people who for several years now been making heroes out of common street thugs while they villainize our law enforcement men and women.

Liberals were counting on Hillary winning in 2016…Kavanaugn even brought that up last week in his opening statement…but when Hillary lost, lost too to liberals was the opportunity to nominate liberal activist judges who would fundamentally transform our justice system by engaging social engineering from the bench.

If I’m not right about this, then why aren’t liberals trying to Kavanaugh their own?

New Jersey Democrat, and a sitting member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Cory Booker, who has had it in for Judge Kavanaugh since the day Kavanaugh was nominated, wrote back in 1992 of an incident that took place when he himself was in high school. Booker wrote in a column entitled, ‘So Much for Stealing Second’  that,“As the ball dropped, I leaned over to hug a friend and she met me instead with an overwhelming kiss.” Booker continued…”As we fumbled upon the bed… I slowly reached for her breast. After having my hand pushed away once, I reached my ‘mark.” Booker’s column went on to state, in his words, “The next week in school she told me that she was drunk that night and didn’t really know what she was doing.”

Sounds familiar doesn’t it? Booker has admitted to doing what Kavanaugh has been baselessly accused of doing, and yet because Booker is a liberal, he’s not being Kavanaughed by the liberals.

After the claims and reports regarding Gennifer Flowers and Bill Clinton came to light, Hillary Clinton called Flowers, “some failed cabaret singer who doesn’t have much of a resume to fall back on.”

Juanita Broaddrick claims Hillary warned her to remain silent regarding her rape claims against Bill Clinton.

Kathleen Willey claimed Bill groped her in 1993, after which she claims she found a dead cat on her porch, found a man hiding under her porch, and found a person in her neighborhood asking about her children…all of which she, to this day claims were intimidation tactics used by Hillary and Bill to keep her silent. In fact, Wiley claims that at a lunch between Clinton supporter Sidney Blumenthal and reporter Christopher Hitchens Blumenthal reportedly said of Willey, “well she looks good today … she’s not going to look good by Friday.”

And Paula Jones claims that after she alleged that Bill propositioned her and exposed himself to her that Hillary and Bill, “sent out people to dig up trash on me.” The Clintons paid Jones $850,000 for her silence by the way.

In each of those cases, the women involved, Flowers, Broaddrick, Wiley and Jones made allegations against Bill Clinton and in turn, both Hillary and Bill launched a campaign to “search and destroy” the women.

Then, there was Monica Lewinski… Hillary called Monica Lewinski, “a narcissistic loony toon,” in an effort to “search and destroy” Monica and called all the allegations “a vast right wing conspiracy” but Lewinski had something nobody making allegations against Judge Kavanaugh has…evidence to back her allegations.

There something else here that bears consideration…just like Christine Blasey Ford, Flowers, Broaddrick, Wiley and Jones all waited years before making their allegations, but unlike Christine Blasey Ford…no liberals believed the survivors. Monica Lewinski, on the other hand, came forth immediately, and she had the DNA to prove her claims.

To this day, I have no idea whether Flowers, Broaddrick, Wiley or Jones are really victims of Bill Clinton, and neither does anyone but them and Bill…but I and everybody else knows without a shadow of a doubt…Monica was telling the truth.

Bill Clinton never had to prove his innocence, and he never faced legal ramifications or any other sort regarding the allegations made by anyone other than Monica Lewinski…and that is exactly as it should be because Monica proved him guilty.

And what of Ruth Bader Ginsburg who, In 1977 when she was General Counsel of the ACLU, co-authored Sex Bias in the U.S. Code: A Report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, in which is advocated concerning “18 U.S.C. §2032 — Eliminate the phrase “carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife who has not attained the age of sixteen years” and substitute a Federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense patterned after S. 1400 §1633: A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and (1) compels the other person to participate: (A) by force or (B) by threatening or placing the other person in fear that any person will imminently be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping; (2) has substantially impaired the other person’s power to appraise or control the conduct by administering or employing a drug or intoxicant without the knowledge or against the will of such other person, or by other means; or (3) the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old”

Not only that, but the book also advocates the repeal of the Mann Act stating, “The Mann Act . . . poses the invasion of privacy issue in an acute form. The Mann Act also is offensive because of the image of women it perpetuates . . . . It was meant to protect from ‘the villainous interstate and international traffic in women and girls,’ ‘those women and girls who, if given a fair chance, would, in all human probability, have been good wives and mothers and useful citizens. . . .”

Are there any social engineering liberals out there demanding the removal of Ginsburg from the nation’s highest court over her advocating pedophilia from 12 years to adulthood or the sex trafficking of women?

Obviously, hypocrisy plays a real and present role in liberal social engineering.

In this particular case, here is the liberal playbook…put forth a baseless, 36 year old allegation against Judge Kavanaugh…have the liberal mainstream run with it 24/7 throughout their news cycle, and get liberals on the street to take it from there. Watch as garden variety liberals push the socially engineered version of guilty until proven innocent.

Where a Constitutionalist, originalist judge is concerned, the “presumption of innocence” means nothing to liberals.

While liberals are being led to believe that allegations are the same as evidence, nothing could be further from the truth. Christine Blasey Ford has leveled allegations, as have a handful of others all dating back some 35 plus years, but neither Ford nor anyone else has provided even a shred of evidence to back their baseless allegations.

The “rule of law” says that the accused, in this case, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, has a “presumption of innocence” and that the burden of proof is on the accuser…however…a socially reengineered system of justice as is being attempted now by liberals says that allegations equal evidence and that the burden of proof is squarely on Kavanaugh to prove his innocence.

Using liberal logic based upon their attempted social reengineering of our judicial system, Bill Clinton is a serial rapist and sexual abuser of women and should be locked up in prison…Keith Ellison is guilty of assault…Cory Booker should be immediately removed from the Senate and face possible prosecution based on his own admissions…and scores of sitting members of congress from both parties should, without so much as a trial, be removed from their seats and face prosecution based on a combination of allegations and pay-offs made with taxpayer dollars.

The question that needs to be asked, is how many liberals, either in the halls of congress or on the street, would willingly give up their right to “presumption of innocence?”

Senate Republicans have placated this liberal social reengineering of our judicial system long enough, and when I believe this latest FBI “investigation” shows absolutely no evidence against Judge Kavanaugh, it is high time that Senate Republicans grow a set, and stand for the rule of law.

They need to call out this social engineering tactic for exactly what it is, get behind Judge Kavanaugh, confirm him as the next U.S. Supreme Court Justice, and make the liberals own this absurd, anti-American tactic heading in to the November midterm election.

Liberals would have succeeded in socially reengineering our judicial system from inside our courtrooms had Hillary won in 2016, and what they’re attempting with regard to Judge Kavanaugh is a last minute desperation hail Mary attempt to accomplish the social reengineering of our judicial system via the court of public opinion. If successful, our judicial system will no longer matter and convictions will forever more be doled out at the mere mention of a baseless accusation.

It is now more important than ever before for Republicans and Conservatives to cast their ballots for Republicans this November so as to protect the very bedrock of our judicial system, the “presumption of innocence” and to preserve the rule of law.

Let your Senators know how you feel by forwarding to them a link to this article.

For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Craig Andresen’s blog The Patriot Factor to read her latest article The Details of the Democrats Evil Plan Exposed


Today, Tuesday, September 25th from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss ‘The Details of the Democrats Evil Plan Exposed;’ ‘The Social Reengineering of Our Justice System;’ and important news of the day.

Hope you can tune in at:

…or on Tune-In at:

2 thoughts on “The Social Reengineering of Our Justice System

  1. i agree w/the article
    i believe it is the chance now for all of us to vote in the mid terms and try to reverse this tsunami
    the left is not going to stop and nor must we
    our kids, its time we step up and teach them abt this country and the constitution
    it is time to fight back and that is now

  2. I stand with Brett. I believe, and I watched it all, that Brett was righteously indignant when he (lost it). I suppose Jesus “lost it” when he started overturning tables in the temple because of people turning it into what today would be a flea market. I am a survivor of rape, attempted murder, etc. I left it up to God to take care of it, and He did. At the time this happened to me, a woman had few rights. I think the feminine rights movement has gone too far. I certainly hope that we Republicans STAND AND DELIVER a yes vote for Brett.

Comments are closed.