Hillary Clinton, along with violating the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Federal Records 
Keeping Act…along with her treason related to Benghazi and lies told to cover her ample, pant-suited ass…is also a vile and vicious anti-constitution freak show regarding our 2nd Amendment.
Before I get to her specific comments, allow me to ask anyone with a working brain cell…and the liberals without such…to tell us all just how effective the liberal gun control measures are working out for them.
Gun free zones? Really? The majority of mass shootings in this country take place in liberal induced gun free zones yet every time some liberal crackpot opens fire in a school or college, liberal numb-nuts rush to the nearest microphone or to their social media to demand more gun restrictions.
And gun restrictions and gun registrations…
There’s another couple of big bags of crap.
The majority of 
shootings in this country are carried out by liberal thugs who have unregistered to them or stolen guns. It’s just a simple fact that those with murder and mayhem on their minds aren’t going to bother getting a gun through over-the-counter means and they sure as hell aren’t going to register the gun they stole.
And restricting weapons…i.e. not selling them isn’t going to stop any but those who DO follow the law.
That’s about as simple as 2+2=4 but the common core liberals just can’t get the right answer and they expect the rest of us to applaud them and give them a participation trophy just for showing up with their bone-crushing stupidity.
Want to see how well abject liberal retardation really works?
Have a look at shooting statistics in cities that have been under liberal control for 
decades. In fact, of the top 10 most dangerous cities in America…10 out of that top ten are under the control of liberals. Chicago…how’s your anti-gun crap working out for you? Baltimore…your anti-gun crap keeping everybody safe? Detroit…all quiet in Motown?
Gun free zone churches.
Gun free zone restaurants.
Gun free zone schools.
Gun free zone colleges and universities.
Gun Free zone cities.
It seems the only people in any of those places without guns are the victims while the criminal element comes armed to the teeth and ready to kill in any and all of those target-rich environments.
Gun free MILITARY BASES???
Don’t even get me started.
You want the epitome of liberal cranial-rectal disease? Obama and his pathetic liberal ilk made our military posts…in WAR ZONES…gun free to all but the ISLAMISTS whose hearts and minds our butt-stupid CIC was trying to win. Win the damn war? Not on the liberal agenda. Giving weapons to Islamists and letting them roam around our military installations in a war zone while preventing our own military and military contractors from carrying bullets…so as not to offend the Islamists? Yeah…that worked out well and rather than calling it what is was…a failed liberal gun control policy…Obama and his ilk called it “Green/Blue violence…the equivalent of the Ft. Hood terrorist attack being called workplace violence.
But Hillary wants more than just more gun restrictions and a federal database of gun owners…so that liberals will know where to go to seize people’s weapons…she wants to shred the 2nd Amendment.
Last week, an audio of Hillary started getting circulated around social media in which she goes after the NRA, the SCOTUS and the 2nd Amendment…
First of all…while Chicago, Baltimore, Detroit and so many other liberal meccas are getting shot up on a daily and nightly basis and while gun free zones are increasingly easy targets for liberal whack-jobs…ever hear of somebody opening fire at an NRA meeting or an NRA rally?
Of course not.
Second…she’s “going to sneak out” and do everything she can to shred the 2nd Amendment because, if you’re going to go against the very Constitution you are hoping to swear to uphold…you have to be sneaky in doing so rather than doing it openly.
And third…before any of you cult of Trump blind followers start crowing that this is why we HAVE to vote for your cult leader…before he started masquerading as a Republican…back when he was who he really is…here’s what Trump had to say about gun control…
Along with identifying as a democrat, praising Nancy Pelosi, advocating for a liberal, single payer, universal healthcare system and being Hillary Clinton’s champion in that short piece…did you hear Trump, at the 21 second mark, say he hates the concept of guns?
Need it a little clearer? Again…from his own mouth…
Trump also wrote in his book, that he was FOR certain gun controls, especially on “assault” weapons and for longer waiting times before people could GET a gun. “I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun.”
And who’s idea was “assault” weapons control?
Why…glory be…that was Hillary’s and Bill’s grand idea and not until 2011, when he was thinking of running as a Republican, did Trump, for the sake of political expediency, start acting like he was all for ridding us of Hillary’s gun control measures.
It’s really no different than when Hillary claimed to be against the standard liberal gun control agenda back in 2007 when SHE found it expedient to try and distance HERSELF from Obama’s gun control crap by telling an audience… “I disagree with Sen. Obama’s assertion that people in our country cling to guns and have certain attitudes about trade and immigration simply out of frustration. You know, my dad took me out behind the cottage that my grandfather built on a little lake called Lake Winola outside of Scranton and taught me how to shoot when I was a little girl.”
“You know, some people now continue to teach their children and their grandchildren. It’s part of culture. It’s part of a way of life. People enjoy hunting and shooting because it’s an important part of who they are. Not because they are bitter.” Obama’s gun control ideas, she said, were both “elitist and out of touch,” and yet those are now the exact same gun controls and more that she advocates.
Hillary was just taking the opposite side of her true feelings to distance herself from Obama in the exact same way that Trump is now taking the opposite stance of HIS true feelings in an attempt to f
urther con the gullible into believing he is different from Hillary.
What doesn’t seem to matter a damn to either Hillary or Trump is the 2nd Amendment which clearly states…
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
For the sake of fact, rather than argument…”well regulated” in the parlance of our Founders and Framers meant that the “militia” or…”the people” should have their weapons in good working order, well calibrated and functioning as expected. It most certainly did not mean that the government should regulate who could or could not own weapons or what sort of weapons the people could own.
And the final salvo OF our 2nd Amendment made that point as sharp as a razor and as clear as crystal…”the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
To add to the unconstitutional liberal agenda, as though the liberal attacks on our 2nd
Amendment aren’t enough…both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are all for placing government regulations on our freedom of speech. Both advocate amending the First Amendment to permit government regulation of political campaign speech.
Along with Hillary’s ever growing list of censorship crusades against rap music, video games, movies, and television…replete with government imposed penalties levied against the makers and/or producers of material liberals determine to be “offensive”…Hillary is also quite supportive of government restrictions to freedom of speech where it concerns her political opponents distributing a documentary film that’s critical of her in the days before a federal election.
THAT was a case… Citizens United v. FEC…that Hillary’s ilk supported and chased all the way up to the United States Supreme Court.
Our 1st Amendment establishes the right of the people to freely express themselves without fear of reprisal from their government and the 2nd Amendment allows for the defense of the people should the 1st be taken BY the government.
And where does Trump fit into Hillary’s anti 1st Amendment agenda?
Trump, like Hillary, has promised to attack our 1st Amendment as well.
Donald Trum
p, in true liberal style, has become a champion of an authoritarian regime, advocating government censorship over parts of the internet in order to eliminate aspects of speech that he thinks are dangerous (just as does Hillary Clinton) and Trump also wants to eliminate libel laws for the purpose of suing and silencing his political critics who write things about him that he doesn’t particularly like.
Trump’s aggression toward our Constitution is hardly limited to the 1st amendment’s protection of freedoms of speech and of the press but also its protections of religious liberty and the 2nd Amendment’s protections of our right to keep and bear arms, but Trump also wants to gut the 14th Amendment, and has held a long grudge against the 5th Amendment and the individual property rights protected by it.
To be perfectly frank…Trump also doesn’t seem to have much use for the Constitutional separation of powers, as he promises, over and over again, to run his regime more as a dictator than as a president…more as a ruler than as an elected leader.
As for Hillary…
She TOO has been pushing for a regime rather than a Constitutional Republic as she has vowed, over and over again, to use executive action to make end runs around an unwilling congress, thus bypassing the same separation of powers as outlined in the Constitution just as Trump intends to do, and just as Obama HAS done.
There will be those who will deride me, accuse me things, and lie about my political position due to this article, as they have done steadfastly throughout this election season. There will also be those who insist that Trump is better because he has never been an elected official or because Trump is not a part of the NWO.
To all of them…we should be asking…from a standpoint of Constitutionality, or the above evidenced lack thereof…what is the difference between these two liberals…Hillary and Trump? We will be told that because of the pending Supreme Court nominations, we would be better off with Trump. We should tell them, that due to Trump’s recent intimidation tactics against a federal judge…he can be trusted no further than Hillary with respect to naming Constitutional judges. And if both Hillary and Trump are as unconstitutional in their agenda as they in fact are, with both wanting to rule a regime as Obama has done…neither Hillary nor Trump fall OUTSIDE the directives OF the NWO.
The GOP will be making a grave error should they hand the nomination to Donald Trump, not only because Trump WILL lose in November, but because they will be nominating a candidate whose liberal ideology and agenda are identical to Hillary’s where the Constitution is concerned.
Should Trump secure the Republican nomination at the convention, with just 42% of the Republican vote…including democrats who crossed over and voted for Trump…and when he loses in November…those of us in the #NEVERHILLARY, #NEVERBERNIE and #NEVERTRUMP camps will not be to blame because we didn’t vote for his nomination in the first place.
Remember, according to two Supreme Court cases, Cousins v. Wigoda in 1975 and the Democratic Party v. Wisconsin ex Rel. La Follette in 1981, the political party holds power over the states in elections and therefore CAN override or overrule their binding rules at the convention thus freeing all delegates from their state’s primary candidate designation even on the first ballot of the convention.
Should the GOP hand Trump the nomination at the Convention, they would, in both effect and in reality, be silencing the votes of the 58% majority of Republican voters who did NOT vote for Trump.
Those in the cult of Trump, with their eyes so tightly shut that they cannot see the plain facts presented, whether out of blind loyalty to, or because they have so heavily invested themselves in, a candidate whose ideology and agenda is absolutely no different from that of Hillary Clinton and they just can’t bring themselves, out of nothing but sheer pride, to admit their mistake.
The simple fact is, no candidate can be properly or accurately vetted based on promises they claim they will keep in the future…only on their words, actions and where they have stood on issues in the past.
They will try to tell us all that not voting for Trump will get us Hillary when in fact…voting FOR Trump would only get us a different VERSION of Hillary.
REMINDER!!!
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS…LIVE!
Wednesday, June 8th, from 2 to 4pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori will discuss Pagliano vs Hillary, two important issues one comical and one serious, a racist big mouth, and losing our Constitutional rights.
Hope you can tune in at: americanpbn.com and check out our amazing Platinum Player.
NRA stands with Trump.
I am the NRA.