What in the hell was former Deputy Director of the CIA, Mike Morrell, TALKING about last Wednesday under sworn testimony before the house committee?
Seriously…
WHAT THE HELL???
He agreed to appear at the hearing, to in his words, “Lay out the facts,” regarding the altering of the CIA’s Benghazi talking points memo because, again in his own words, “The ethical code under which intelligence officers carry out their responsibilities calls for total objectivity.”
What followed was, in fact, THE most SUBJECTIVE testimony, full of abject contradictions, he could have possibly delivered.
It was, to be blunt, nothing less than a stunning exercise in ass covering that left more questions than it answered including one very important query…
Exactly who’s ass was he covering FOR???
Michelle Bachmann, who doled out perhaps THE most pointed and forceful line of questioning during the hearing has her theory on that answer.
According to congresswoman Bachmann, Mike Morrell was, “taking the fall” for Hillary Clinton.
“She couldn’t have a better person to take the fall for her because Morrell was involved in rewriting the talking points as he was the No. 2 at CIA,” congresswoman Bachmann related to WND in a candid interview. Bachmann was submitting that Morrell was cleaning up the mess to allow Hillary, “WHAT DIFFERENCE, AT THIS POINT, DOES IT MAKE” Clinton to make a 2016 run for the oval office, “so, he can come in authoritatively [and] say, ‘No, that’s not the story. The story is the fake story we tried to push.'”
Perhaps but, Morrell would also have to be confirmed in 2016 and, the way things are shaping up for the 2014 midterms, even IF Hillary runs and wins, she may well be facing a republican majority in the house AND the senate rendering such a confirmation highly unlikely.
That said…
I’m NOT discounting the entire theory as the path WOULD need clearing just for a Hillary RUN and part of Morrell’s testimony would indicate that, at least in part, Bachmann is spot on.
According to Morrell…
He, removed the references to terrorism and the Ansar al Sharia tie-in to the Benghazi attacks from the talking points memo because…HE THOUGHT IT WOULD BE UNPROFESSIONAL TO…EMBARRASS HILLARY’S DEPARTMENT OF STATE!!!
He then, in true ass covering mode, reversed course and laid THIS gem on the committee:
“We did not deliberately downplay the role of terrorists in the Benghazi attack in our analysis or in the talking points.”
He removed the mentions of terrorism from the talking points memo so as not to embarrass the woman who’s Russian reset button failed, who accepted a wink and a smile from Lil Kim in North Korea, under whose bloodshot eyes, Iran stepped UP their efforts to build nuclear weapons and, to the applause of the left, had her GREATEST accomplishment in FLYING 1 MILLION MILES but…He DIDN’T “downplay the role of terrorists in Benghazi???”
See what I mean???
WHAT THE HELL?????
It gets even stranger.
Morrell, after testifying under oath that he did indeed remove all references to terrorism from the CIA talking point to protect the “reputation” of “Hillary The Incompetent” without downplaying the role of terrorists, THEN went ON to swear that the blaming of a You Tube video that virtually nobody had ever seen was ADDED to those talking points.
BY WHOM…EXACTLY…He claims he DOES NOT KNOW!!!
According to Morrell’s sworn testimony…The last time HE saw the talking points, a day before Susan Rice’s 5 Sunday show festival of lying…The video was NOT a part of them and somehow, SOMEONE added them before Rice got HER hands on the talking points.
Oh really?
Using the power of deductive reasoning, If Morrell was telling the truth, there are potentially only 3 people who COULD have added that utter BS.
Susan Rice’s only superior at the Department of State…One Hillary Clinton…
Morrell’s only superior at the CIA…One Leon Panetta OR…
Leon Panetta’s ONLY superior…BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA!!!
And…according again to Morrell’s sworn testimony…From where DID the whole idea OF that video being the responsible factor in the Benghazi attacks come???
Why…From CIA analysts and…THE MEDIA…of course.
CIA analysts who were AT THEIR DESKS IN LANGLEY VIRGINIA rather than CIA PERSONNEL who were ON THE GROUND…IN BENGHAZI…DURING THE ATTACKS which would include, by Morrell’s testimony…THE CIA FIELD OPERATION’S CHIEF AT THE VERY BENGHAZI ANNEX WHERE FORMER NAVY SEALS AND THEN, SECURITY OFFICER CONTRACTEES TO THE CIA…GLEN DOHERTY AND TYRONE WOODS…WERE MURDERED IN THE ATTACK!!!
That field director, whose name has been withheld do to top secret clearance, TOLD MORRELL DIRECTLY, JUST 4 DAYS AFTER THE ATTACKS…THAT THERE HAD BEEN NO…I REPEAT NO PROTEST AND THAT THE ATTACKS ON BOTH THE BENGHAZI MISSION AND THE CIA ANNEX WERE, WITHOUT A DOUBT…PRE-PLANNED…TERRORIST ATTACKS…CARRIED OUT BY ANSAR AL SHARIA…AL QAEDA’S LIBYAN TERRORIST ORGANIZATION!!!
And other than the lower lever desk jockeys from Langley, where did the video ruse come from???
Morrell’s OTHER…Trusted more than his FIELD DIRECTOR IN BENGHAZI source…THE DAMN MEDIA!!!
So…Where did the MEDIA get the BS to pass along?
Check the mainstream media and see IN whose ass THEIR heads are imbedded and the answer is…BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA or…HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON and we all know this regime leaks info to make themselves look good or divert attention away from their collective crimes.
The ONLY place the mainstream MEDIA could have gotten the You Tube video false story, since THEY had not a single reporter on the ground in Benghazi…WAS FROM THE ADMINISTRATION and, as so often dutifully do…They repeated every word of what the regime told them.
Now then, let’s connect some dots.
We all know that “the video” led to protests in Egypt and elsewhere the day BEFORE the attacks in Benghazi while we ALSO know that said video had only a HANDFUL of views before ANY of this happened.
How do you suppose that video suddenly became the camel trough talk in Egypt and elsewhere OVERNIGHT???
I believe it may WELL have been distributed BY the Obama regime to provide COVER for what THEY KNEW was about to happen in Benghazi and that, for whatever reason…Ansar al Sharia’s Benghazi attack was MEANT to be swept under the rug of the video storm.
I also firmly believe, as I have stated many times, that the CIA was running weapons through the State Department to the TURKS who, as strawmen, ala Fast and Furious…The DRY RUN, I believe FOR the op in Benghazi, were then handing those weapons, previously provided to the 
al Qaeda Libyan “REBELS” to al Qaeda SYRIAN “rebels” and that our Ambassador, Chris Stevens, was about to blow the whistle or, close down the Benghazi mission to put a stop TO it..
KILLING Stevens was the ONLY way to SILENCE him PERMANENTLY and anyone else who got in the way was just too bad…so sad.
Who had the most, I mean other than their lives, to LOSE if the true nature, TREASON, The arming of our ENEMIES in a time of war was to come out???
HILLARY CLINTON WITH HER ASPIRATIONS FOR 2016 AND…BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA WITH HIS THEN ASPIRATIONS FOR 2012!!!
The circle of possibilities is getting far too small to ignore..
Isn’t it a coincidence that those 2 were also 2 of the ONLY 3 people who could have added the video crap to the scrubbed down talking points and, that the 3rd just happened to be the DIRECTOR OF THE CIA WITHOUT WHOM…A CIA WEAPON’S RUNNING BLACK OP COULD NEVER HAVE TAKEN PLACE???
Isn’t it also a coincidence that Hilary looked the other way when Ambassador Stevens was pleading for MORE security before she REMOVED American security contractors from Benghazi only to REPLACE them with Ansar al Sharia’s February 17th militia?
And further more…ANOTHER coincidence that Obama was “leading from behind” when HE armed those “rebels” in the FIRST place knowing FULL WELL they were al Qaeda???
If that’s not enough…Wasn’t it a coincidence that it was Obama’s HAND PICKED, SEAT AT THE TABLE SUCCESSORS to Mubarack…THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD in Egypt that got hold of that You Tube Video and put on a show at our embassy in Cairo at JUST the right time to disguise a blatant and murderous attack on the only western outpost in the middle of nowhere but an al Qaeda controlled region of Libya???
Let’s face it…Such an attack, ON ITS OWN…Would have drawn far, FAR too much attention but…WHEN PROVIDED THE COVER OF OTHER “SPONTANEOUS PROTESTS” which I believe HAD TO BE COORDINATED as they sprang up out of NOWHERE…ALL AT THE SAME TIME AND…ALL BECAUSE OF SOME VIDEO THAT VIRTUALLY NO ONE HAD SEEN UNTIL…SOMEHOW…THEY ALL SAW IT AND BECAME OUTRAGED…AT THE SAME TIME…
Well…
These are no coincidences.
THESE are CONVENIENCES.
CAREFULLY PLANNED AND ORCHESTRATED CONVENIENCES, in my opinion, TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY COVER FOR A HIT JOB ON AMBASSADOR STEVENS…THE MAN WHO WAS IN A POSITION TO EXPOSE THE TREASON BEING COMMITTED BY THE OBAMA REGIME!!!
Whether wittingly or un
wittingly, Mike Morrell was used to bury the truth of what was going on in Benghazi BEFORE September 11th, 2012 and, the truth of the attacks that took place there. As for congresswoman Bachmann’s submittal that Morrell was covering Hilary’s pant-suited ass…
He was but, the reason went far beyond her possible 2016 run…
It was TREASON and the cover story was meant for HER ass and those very few other asses above her pay grade.
Craig Andresen
The National Patriot
Weekend Edition 4/5/2014
This Blog is very good as usual. Don’t miss it!