And as far as him trying his little intimidation act on the SCOTUS – I pray to God,, that back fires on him. His arrogance is just too much to handle sometimes. And what if the SCOTUS does declare it unconstitutional – will we have another “Pelican Brief” on our hands. I think so…..murder is NOTHING to this dangerous man.

ShadowPatriot.

First of all, you totally negate your entire argument the moment you started name-calling. Haven’t you ever heard that the first person to swear or name call in an argument loses the argument? No? Then take a few notes.

What makes you an expert on history? Your community college experience? Actually, any college experience or the History Channel? If you went to community college and are young enough, congratulations, you have been indoctrinated into the left-leaning world of twisted facts.

You obviously supported Obamacare. Here is a history lesson for you. Social Security started out as simply a VOLUNTARY program under FDR. Let’s break down “VOLUNTARY” a little, as it has a few more syllables than you are used to…it means, in essence, to choose to do it or not. Additionally, that little 9 digit number was never intended to be used for identification purposes. I dare you to try to NOT pay into Social Security, or to not use it on an application for a job (which you should probably try to find…what? No jobs? Blame Obama and his “masterpiece” legislation.). Why? Employers MUST look at the cost of hiring someone, and that is more than simply an hourly wage. No amount of tax breaks is going to incentivize an employer to hire someone.

Now, I am going to assume by “con” you mean Republican, and from now on that is how I am going to reference your term. Just to reiterate the Admin’s statement, because any reasonable person would indeed agree with it, our current President is a failure NOT because of his skin, but because he has failed to uphold his oath. This is not to say that any one President ever perfectly executed the oath, but this one seemed to have his fingers crossed behind his back when he finally was able to say the oath (it took two tries…google it).

One of the reasons, I believe, that the Supreme Court has never taken up the case is the potential for a Constitutional crisis. Think about it, our founders, the framers of this great Constitution, never imagined that anyone BUT a natural born citizen would be elected to office. A person who fulfills the requirements as outlined in the Constitution. It is incontrovertible that the digital versions of the birth certificate and the selective service card are forgeries. So, where are the real ones? Should be simple enough to produce originals. Knowing those facts, I believe the Supreme Court is frightened of the implication that should the documents prove false, and no originals exist, that a crisis unlike any they have ever seen before would occur. In other words, their silence on the matter is very much leaving it to the states to decide, and many are attempting to. Barring fraud, the incumbent will not be on some state ballots.

And, I have to agree with you, the Supreme Court has wrongly interpreted the 14th Amendment as conferring citizenship on anyone born here (and, guess what…in 1866, the 14th Amendment was passed…with NO Democrat support…If I were you, I would question your assertion that Republicans are racist.).

As for the Ryan plan, you left something out. In conjunction with reducing taxes, spending is also reduced. So, think about it…you are spending less and therefore need to take in less. Simple. Oh, and by reducing taxes, you put more money in the hands of the individual. The INDIVIDUAL drives commerce in the United States. Not some elected or unelected official. The INDIVIDUAL choosing to purchase something drives the economy. More disposable income, more buying. More commerce is created. More jobs. More jobs means (wait for it)…more tax revenue coming into government coffers. This has proven true all throughout history. Look at the forgotten recession (here is the link for your edification http://mises.org/daily/3788 ADMIN!! DON’T EDIT IT!! This guy needs a history lesson!). Look at the Reagan years. And those are two examples. At no time did spending more than came in ever save the economy. At no time did government direction of the economy help. If government control of the economy was the answer, then Russia would be an economic powerhouse. North Korea would not be wallowing in poverty.

I have no idea what his religion is, but there are clues. And frankly, I do not care what his religion is. That is his business. He may indeed subscribe to “Love they neighbor” (incidentally, that little proverb is NOT one of the ten commandments…I know…I actually read them.), but I am still wondering which neighbor he loves.

Now, that the incumbent hates the Constitution may be a bit strong as I am sure he loves seeing how far he can stretch it. Just remember, he HAS stated he was going to “fundamentally change America.” Do you have any idea what “fundamental” means? It means “A central or primary rule or principle on which something is based.” So, what is the fundamental rule or principle upon which America is based? The Constitution. To fundamentally change America means to change the Constitution. It is simple analysis that leads to that conclusion. As far as Patriotism is concerned, do you know what that means as well? “Love of country and willingness to sacrifice for it.” No man or woman is subordinate to the President. We owe our (waning) prosperity to the foundation upon which this country was founded. A Patriot is willing to die for that foundation. I cannot talk about the motives of whomever says what they say about the man in office, but I can say I will fight to the death to protect their right to say what they want (including yourself). That makes me Patriotic. Are you willing to do the same? Is the incumbent?

Now, to give this a little context, yes. I agree with your assertion that Bush was no true conservative. He got us into messes that we are going to take a long time extricating (use a dictionary) ourselves from. He did start TARP, and did use the money in ways the TARP bill never intended. So, yes, he was not a great president; however, I would have him back in a heartbeat if I could. “MIss me yet?” Why, yes sir, I do.

As far as slamming him with lies, are lies verifiable? No. They fall apart in the face of scrutiny. However, none of the accusations against the incumbent that are based on fact fall apart. None. And he has a lot of factual accusations. I will not list them here, because this response would get very large, not that it is not already.

And in finishing, only a narcissist would think themselves right after a largely rambling answer backed by nothing more than name calling and race baiting. Yes, you are race baiting by accusing a group of people who disagree with a black president as being racist.

ShadowPatriot.

As you have chosen to leave your absurd comment on this blog, please provide an example of my dislike for Obama based upon his race. I dislike his policies, his ideology, his socialism and his arrogance.
His color has not a thing to do with it.

What makes they think that because he is not the president you want, he is failing. Haven’t they ever heard that one mans meat is another mans poison. With the hate the cons have for him, don’t they think that they would be biased as hell? Lies have to have creditably to be believed, a concept that a con finds completely incomprehensible. The cons with their continuous he’s a failure s–t are really starting to sound stupid. Their problem is that Obama fails to be a white con, and that is a failure only in their deluded mind.

Yet they have REFUSED to hear any of these eligibilty cases. It would only take four for the case to be heard. Why because in their mind there is NO CONTROVERSY. Their definition of a natural born citizen is anyone born in the United States is a NBC period regardless of the citizenship of the parents unless the parent are foreign diplomats. You can all beleive what you want but unless the US Supreme Courts changes its position you are just spitting into the wind.

You can all howl at the moon all you want the U.S. Supreme Court will never rule the president ineligible and NO STATE IN THE US WILL TAKE HIM OFF THE 2012 BALLOT. If you want him out you will have to vote for Romney and possibly Sen. Rubio.

so tell me again, how does reducing taxes, balance the budget? Cause then revenue is even less for the government. Ryans plan adds even more to the deficit than obama… Ryan adds 3 trillion.

Obama does not meet the rigid definition of ‘communist’ that you are using. Communist carries a negative connotation in America since the red scare.
No, he’s not a true communist, Then, if by chance, Romney gets elected, they’ll see in 3 years how his policies are virtually the same as Obama’s, because Romney is at heart a moderate and so is Obama (all these fools who call him an extreme liberal, socialist, Marxist, etc. are shills for the extreme right- the Socialist Party of America has plenty to say about how Obama is definitely not a Socialist- they’re as unhappy with him as the Ex-Conservs are).

By any reasonable and intelligent measure, his predecessor (George Bush) who took us to war with failed intelligence, destroyed the economy and sanctioned torture was MUCH more divisive. Not Obama.

Barack Obama is NOT a Muslim! He IS a Christian. A REAL Christian follows the Ten Commandments. One should rule is “Love Thy neighbor” and Obama has followed that rule to a T.

The idea that Barack Obama hates America is partly because he’s a Democrat, and partly because he’s black, and because the patriotism of African-Americans has long been doubted by some on the right. And it’s still is, when in fact it;s the other way around!

what is wrong with America is that a These haters would call the commander in chief a “domestic enemy” on a social network site. Is that Patritoic? to call the commander in chief a domestic enemy? No. it is out of line and insubordinate.These people are really sick, it’s gotten worse. Seek help.

The right-wing’s hate mongering of President Obama’s religion, race and political philosophy has grown to a fever pitch, and is now evidenced in a series of racist righty website such as this (Not MY website).

Obama is not just the closest we’ve come to a power grabbing dictator
and The Republicans who STILL blame Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter for everything under the sun somehow think a President who went into two wars while cutting taxes, one that was a complete disaster (Iraq), who’s Presidency ended with the worst economic disaster since the depression, should be off limits??? You tea baggers really think that? Forget 2012, we will be screaming about Bush for DECADES.
NO AMERICAN GROUP has slammed the President of the United States with as many lies and traitorous hate propaganda as the Rightwing Republicans before President Obama came to office.

Before anyone cries “Bush” Leftwing attacked Bush so its ok for Frightwingers to attack Obama – let me remind them that the Leftwing attacked Bush with FACTS opposed to the Frightwingers who are attacking President Obama with madeup, traitorous hate propaganda that has divided this country.

They have proven me right, again. They are NOT Patriots, They are Racists that hates having black people in the White House. That is a fact!