Craig Andresen

BREITBART…Foolish Little Liberals

By Craig Andresen on March 7, 2012 at 11:53 am

@dysolution
Jordan Peterson It’s tragic when anyone dies at the young age of 43 and isn’t a deceitful loudmouthed asshole like Andrew Breitbart.

@ArsonAnni
Boots They say not to say anything ill of the dead, but to only mention the good. Andrew Breitbart is dead. Good.

@shamama
jack shamama Andrew Breitbart’s death proves you *can* die from asshole-ism.

@Mobute
Mobutu Sese Seko Breitbart should burn eternally on a spit above his roasting incendiary contempt for humanity. Burn over your devil’s fire, you fuck. Burn.

@jayfenster
Jay Fenster Going out on a limb and guessing Andrew Breitbart’s cause of death was anal prolapse. His asshole fell out, and there was nothing left.

@TheReallyRick
ReallyRick HOLY FUCK Andrew Breitbart is dead! Satan has called him home in time for the 2012 election. Notice RIP isn’t trending, tells you something.

These are just a small handful of the tweets sent by liberal scum in the first hours after the announcement of Andrew Breitbart’s death last week. The torrent of nasty foul language messages continued for days.

Breitbart would have been proud.

Andrew Breitbart used to retweet such messages to his legions of followers and wore the hate as a badge of honor.

I intentionally placed @TheReallyRick last for a specific reason. He’s SO happy because in his small mind, Satan called Breitbart home…IN TIME FOR THE 2012 ELECTION.

Foolish little liberal hater.

He has no idea.

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect is defined thusly: Cause and effect (also written as cause-effect or cause/effect) refers to the philosophical concept of causality, in which an action or event will produce a certain response to the action in the form of another event.

Basically, it’s a central concept on Buddism. So is Karma.

Karma in Buddism: In Buddhism, karma (Pāli kamma) is strictly distinguished from vipaka, meaning “fruit” or “result.” Karma is categorized within the group or groups of cause (Pāli hetu) in the chain of cause and effect, where it comprises the elements of “volitional activities” (Pali sankhara) and “action” (Pali bhava). Any action is understood as creating “seeds” in the mind that will sprout into the appropriate result (Pāli vipaka) when met with the right conditions.

Foolish little liberal haters believe the first effect of Breitbart’s death was that they got to display their vast vocabulary via Twitter, and the second effect was that they and their ilk would be allowed to prosecute the 2012 election without him.

The thing about narrow mindedness, so pervasive in liberals, is that they only see the short-term effect of any cause. This, of course, is why they so adamantly advocate socialism. In the short term, socialism provides for all the needs. In the long term, it runs out of other people’s money and collapses. In the short term, socialism makes everyone equal somewhere in the middle. In the long term, everybody starves and society devolves into chaos and destruction.

With the death last week of Andrew Breitbart, the narrow minded seized the moment to expose their ability to execute completely unique and individual lines of thought. Notice above, in their tweets, how their individual messages use completely different verbiage with which to describe their feelings and a vast and wild array of adjectives with which to describe Breitbart.

Just like snowflakes? No two alike?

HE’S gone. HE won’t be around for the 2012 election.

One man, one voice…Silenced. The view of the narrow minded. One cause, one effect.

Foolish little liberals.

Reality paints with a very broad brush as does cause and effect.

One man has died. Andrew Breitbart. Many will walk his path. Many will carry his torch. Many will continue the work of the one. Ten? One Hundred? One Thousand? A Million?

More?

To claim, as narrow minded fools have, that Breitbart was just one guy with a computer and in the long run doesn’t mean much would be the same as saying Anthony Weiner was just one guy with a cell phone.

When the one guy with a computer and the one guy with a cell phone collided who won? Weiner? Breitbart?

The truth won.

Breitbart was not the boy in the bubble, a hermit, a recluse or a loner. He had a team and that team had a mission. Their leader might be gone but the team and the mission remain.

History is Not for the Narrow Minded

To the narrow minded, history can be rewritten. As a simple example, they believe if the word “nigger” is removed from “Huck Finn,” somehow the world is a better place.

Foolish little liberals.

Hiding history doesn’t change history any more than burying a dime in the dirt means that dime no longer exists.

Breitbart was, at the time of his death, working on a most important issue. He was vetting Obama. This, in part, is why liberals were so happy to see him die. Did they really believe what he had learned so far, died with him? Did they honestly believe he took his research to the grave? Are liberals so foolish as to believe that nobody on the Breitbart team had seen the evidence Breitbart had uncovered or that Breitbart was the only one uncovering it?

On Breitbart’s site, “Big Government” is now the last thing HE posted, “The Vetting: Part 1” and in that piece, Breitbart outlines a Chicago theater production of a play championing Saul Alinsky and Obama’s inclusion in a panel discussion afterwards.

Part 1. There will be more parts. Many more.

Just a couple of weeks prior to his death, Breitbart spoke at CPAC and, almost in passing, mentioned that he had videos of Obama as a college student. Breitbart said he was going to release those videos and that they would have a pronounced impact on the 2012 election.

Note to foolish little liberals: Those videos didn’t die with Breitbart nor will they be buried with him.

We are now just days away from the release of those videos. What will they show?

In 2008, during the run-up to the election, Obama was asked about his relationship with Bill Ayers, an unrepentant domestic terrorist.

Q: “A gentleman named William Ayers, he was part of the Weather Underground in the 1970s. They bombed the Pentagon, the Capitol and other buildings. He’s never apologized for that. And in fact, on 9/11 he was quoted in The New York Times saying, ‘I don’t regret setting bombs; I feel we didn’t do enough.’ An early organizing meeting for your state senate campaign was held at his house, and your campaign has said you are friendly. Can you explain that relationship for the voters, and explain to Democrats why it won’t be a problem?”

Obama: “This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who’s a professor of English in Chicago, who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He’s not somebody who I exchange ideas with on a regular basis. And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago when I was 8 years old, somehow reflects on me and my values, doesn’t make much sense.”

To the media and the narrow minded, if you’ll pardon the redundancy, this was enough. Obama never really even knew the domestic terrorist and, if you can believe a domestic terrorist, Ayers didn’t really even know Obama. Case closed.

Will the videos show Obama palling about with Ayers? Other members of the Weather Underground? At socialist party gatherings? Communist party gatherings?

We shall see.

History, Obama’s history, is like a dime. Remember that dime? Even if you bury it, no matter how deep you bury it, it’s still there; and with a sharp enough shovel, or shovels, it can be unearthed.

Breitbart. One man? One computer? One shovel? Ten shovels? One hundred? One thousand? A Million?

More?

The narrow minded believe Andrew Breitbart was the source of their dismay. Breitbart, to them, was the cause.

Andrew Breitbart was not the cause.

Breitbart was, is, and will continue to be the EFFECT.

The narrow minded, those they elect and the media who assists in their dime burying tactics are their own cause.

Andrew Breitbart, the man, is gone. Breitbart the MISSION is ongoing and growing.

It’s long been a political punch line, how the dead vote Democrat. How many liberals, over the years, have been elected, at least in part, by those who occupy cemeteries? How many political races in Chicago have been influenced by the dead?

Remember that last tweet above?

@TheReallyRick
ReallyRick HOLY FUCK Andrew Breitbart is dead! Satan has called him home in time for the 2012 election.

Ironic, isn’t it?

How, this November, votes will be cast by a ghost?

One ghost? Ten Ghosts? One hundred? One thousand? A million?

More?

Now THAT’S karma.

Foolish little liberals.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

10 Responses to “BREITBART…Foolish Little Liberals”

  1. towerclimber37 Says:

    I have thought long and hard about how I felt about this man. I did not think that my words could do him justice.
    I will use the words of another then. Someone smarter than I am.
    Breitbart was a centurion. In Rome, a centurion was a Roman citizen who could read and write and train soldiers in the tasks that soldiers needed to know. He could write dispatches and orders as well.
    More importantly he could teach his soldiers to understand that sacrifice was needed to keep the republic alive.
    When Rome fell, there were less than 500 Centurions left.
    THIS ROME WILL NOT FALL.
    Andrew has shown us how to sacrifice. More importantly he’s shown us how to fight. Tactics that not make the barbarians fear us but keep them guessing which of their weaknesses we will exploit next.
    The left hated Andrew Breitbart with an unabated passion because he exposed their weakness and hypocrisy for the world to see and rubbed their noses in it. He MADE them see the wrongness of their actions.
    We know that now.

    I AM Andrew Breitbart

    THIS Rome WILL NOT FALL! We have Andrew to thank for instructing us. We will carry on and spread his knowledge of tactics and sacrifice.

  2. Jim Barrus Says:

    When I started reading it I was angry and wondered why the post told to read this. Fortunately I kept reading!

    Andrew Breitbart IS/WAS A HERO! He will not be forgotten. We must keep up his work.

    It is said for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Instead of reacting let’s make it ACTION and more than equal. Andrew Breitbart would want that. Whatever we say defending him will have no effect.

  3. Pamela Pilger Says:

    God bless Andrew and his family. He taught us SO much and he had the guts to speak out against lies and hypocracy. We must really pray for all our conservative voices ,and that God will raise up others to stand against the Soros Goliath. R.I.P. brave, precious Andrew.

  4. Ratchwll Says:

    I AM ANDREW BREITBART.

  5. Larry Flury Says:

    To purposefully misuse the source of a lot of these haters own words: We are Breitbart, we are not anonymous, we are singles or twos that are unafraid to stand against the faceless anonymous. We are not legion, we stand alone fearless and armed only with the truth. We do not forgive, we remember every bit of your hatred for the truth but do not hold it against you personally, it is very hard to be smart and truthful and everybody can’t get it done. We do not forget, we shall publish your lies and smears and call out the propaganda wing of any would be ruler of a free people. Expect us, we are coming, only we will come from the front aimed straight at your lies holding the beacon of truth with only our Constitution as our shield. I am Breitbart, and I am watching and protecting truth!

  6. SheilaK Says:

    Nice. We have lost our figurehead, not the fight. These liberal pukes will be silenced soon enough.

    RIP Andrew, you were one of a kind.

  7. Ret. Marine Says:

    As history has shown in previous cases, to the victor comes the claim of truth, as they see fit to print it. There are many words of encouragement in this statement, one, let us not be the ones to define the truth as, because we won, no the truth has no agenda, but the liberal small minds do, as clearly as these tweets have shown, Two, truth has an ugly side of it’s realities, there are no libs out there who refere to the truth for their agenda. The truth has nothing to do with their agenda. Three, yeah small minds indeed. So small in fact, they refuse to see us as “we are all Breitbarts now”, we only seek and dispense of the truths of their facts, as lies. The victors in this case is anyone who displays the ability to seek only the truth, not that of their lies, as being truthful to one and others. I have been telling many in the course of my life, that to be honest first and foremost, one has to be truthful to oneself before engaging in the theory of “telling a lie long enough, it becomes the truth”, but life does not work in this lie and if you so choose to lie to tell a ( supposed) truth, it’s still a lie masqurading as a truth, who is hurt, only the one telling of the lie. When it comes down to the nity n’ grity, we have but one truth, all others will attempt to place it in the lie catergory but they are only fooling themselves. Our Constitution was born of truth while they (the liberal) try and sell it as a lie. This is one main objection I have always had with the liberal mindset. I don’t pretend to know everything, but, at least, I know where to find it.

  8. dick grace Says:

    Those of the left, fools, are always confounded and unable to refute the wisdom of the wise man on the right. Ecclesiastes 10:2.

  9. Les Darbison Says:

    It is our duty to engage as many people as possible. Some will be like minded and that is reassuring some are ill informed and if your prepared, that can be exciting because common sense usually win’s out. And then when you have the facts it feels so good to witness a liberal blow up and wig out.
    You have heard the saying it,s a win win win situation. Please people get out of your comfort zones and engage all those around you it,s REWARDING ( GOD BLESS AMERICA AND GOD BLESS US ALL)

  10. Tim Bolingame Says:

    Pamela Pilger commented on this? Isn’t she the Heil Hitler Hag? She did a “Heil Hitler!” to a jew in vegas on TV. She’s sortof a hosebag.