By John Brewer on April 27, 2011
“This democracy we have is a precious thing…” — Barack Obama.
I suppose I’d be hard-pressed to find a soul among us who hasn’t committed a substantial amount of our adult life watching the news, reading magazines, blog articles, newspapers, listening to talk-radio or chatting with sea-bound grobians among the citizenry. And, I suppose I’d come up empty-handed looking for a soul among us who hasn’t heard or read the word“democracy” kicked around more frequently than a hacky sack at a marathon Grateful Dead-Crosby, Stills, Nash, Young-Phish-Mamas and Papas-Doobie Brothers-The Birds-Simon and Garfunkel-Jefferson Airplane reunion tour. I suppose that, at the tender drinking age of double-decade-uno, had I decided to create a drinking game contingent on the usage of “democracy” among politicians and analysts and generally-untutored droids, I wouldn’t have the capacity to write this right now, as my body would be 10 years dissolved into the dirt and photos of my liver would be circulating among medical journals worldwide. How did he die? If Joe Biden were to answer, he’d say it all came down to a three-syllable word: Democracy.
Democracy, democracy, democracy….
…Yeah, I know there are four syllables. Brush up on your Biden-bits, will ya?
I suppose I’m a young guy with an old heart–refer to the aforementioned example of a marathon reunion tour composed of bands before my time save Phish. I suppose I’m a lexicon-hawk who demands that our politicians and analysts spill out precise meanings as opposed to obscure, emotionally-ridden drivel. There are denotations, precise meanings, and there are connotations, meanings with a slant. I prefer the precise meaning of the meaning–forget the slant of the meaning. I don’t live in a stable and this isn’t Animal Farm…and my name isn’t Boxer! I am in a different mode from the professed meaning and the median is nowhere! Say what you mean, people. And mean what you say. Otherwise, there are folks out there who might convincingly take the connotation as a denotation and fly with it by the seat of their sea-bound waders.
“So, let me be clear..”–Barack Obama
The United States of America was established as a republic tempered with traces of democracy, not a democracy tempered with traces of republicanism. We were founded as a democratic-republic, not a republican-democracy…and feel free to guffaw at the notion we are a democracy; at least, feel free to guffaw if you’re of the mind of the framers–who considered the notion of full-throttle democracy as absurd, fatuous, meshugga! And they had every right–”RIGHT”–to feel that way. Or, shall I add, they had every “RIGHT” to think that way, as well.
Our framers were not exclusively Ivy-leagued, power-charting, politically-oriented robots like the cast of characters overwhelming us today–check your watch! They were lawyers, farmers, philosophers, soldiers, inventors, physicians, business-owners, etc….in other words, they were well-rounded thinkers, thinkers possessed of minds that sprawled with branches.
Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, who worked at his father’s shipping business while studying to be a doctor, was a contributor to the Constitutional Convention, and he stated, “the evils we experience flow from the excess of democracy. The people do not want virtue, but are the dupes of pretend patriots.”
George Mason, a self-motivated construction-worker with no formal schooling, saw eye-to-eye with James Madison, a political philosopher schooled in Latin, Greek, Hebrew, geography, and mathematics. Both of them, delegates at the Constitutional Convention, understood that it was essential to set up a House of Representatives beholden to the people, but that the other branches of the budding government should have some check on the dangers of democracy.
In other words, Madison and Mason, like Jefferson and Franklin and Adams and Washington and myriad well-rounded thinkers, wanted checks against the tyranny of the majority…against the tyranny of democracy.
“Democracy is two wolves and one lamb voting on what to have for dinner”…Winston Churchill
“Democracy simply means the bludgeoning of the people by the people and for the people”…Oscar Wilde
What am I saying about democracy?
Democracy is, essentially, a mob-rule of lawlessness. It is a rule of the voters and nothing but the voters. It is diametrically-opposed to the Republic’s rule of law. It is sanctioned and organized anarchy, in which 50%+1=the power to take away theindividual rights of those whom are 50%-1. It is an adherence to a whimsical and demagogically-vulnerable populace. In simple terms, it allows for a posse or lynch-mob of 5 to hang a minority of 4, because, by the definition of democracy, the majority rules…and thus shall be hanged. But, do you want examples vice hypotheticals?
How did it work out for that other great civilization?
How did democracy work out for Athens, Greece?
How did it work for the Athenian leaders when they deferred to the whims of the people–and their white-black voting shells–for every policy that came to the fore? How did it work out for Cleisthenes–who was ostracized and ran out of town on a rail when things didn’t suit the majority, a majority responsible for the things which didn’t suit them? How did it work out for Cimon–who was also sent into exile? How did it work out for the Delian-league treasurers whom were executed at the whims of the people prior to the discovery of an accounting error which would otherwise have acquitted them? How did that exhumation and revival work for the rigor mortified? How did it work for the Athenian-Generals at Arginusae over Sparta, whom were executed for failure to retreive their dead soldiers? And how did it work when the moonbats calling for the Athenian-Generals’ execution were executed for executing a subsequently-determined illegal execution?
Do any of you recall the call from our current administration to prosecute officials from the prior administration? Why would they suggest such an action? Are they believers in the Republic for which we stand? Or are they believers in a democracy for which the Athenians foundered under? Change policy and charge people ex post facto? What kind of nonsense is that?
And, how did it work for Socrates? How did it work for the one voice opposing the gut-spasms of the populace? How did it work for the lone “right” voice when the “wrong” were proven “wrong” and wrong-fully focused their anger towards the “right?” How did that hemlock taste? How did that democracy work?
How did the ostracism of politicians work? How did the slap-dash execution of military-strategists work? How did the erroneous “dusting” of financial gurus work? How did the silencing-through-poisoning work? It didn’t.
Athens had promise, yet Athens fell!
WE, the United States of America, were instituted as a federation of republics with the solitary aim of protecting people and their property. “Individualism,” I say! There were no commissions upon commissions, no councils upon councils, no czars upon czars, no subsidies upon further subsidies, no pander-some and pimpified flares of entitlements and privileges, and no regulatory-regulating-regulators regulating regulations.
By means of a social contract–put forth via the spirit of the Declaration of Independence; put forth via the mind of the United States Constitution–a foundation was laid for individuals and businesses to grow together, in a competitive environment, in what would quickly manifest as the most innovative and capable country on earth. It was a wealth creator! It was the rule of law and not the rule of men/women/special interest sects/etc…which made it so.
John Adams, Samuel Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Benjamin Harrison, John Hancock, Thomas Jefferson, and all others, understood the individual hazards prevalent within pure democracy, and so they envisioned a governing system of separated powers–a governing system that would embrace the spirit of the great body of society sans the influence of a favored class; a governing system composed of only one body, the House of Representatives, which would be directly answerable to the citizenry; and a governing system of indirect appointments such as the Supreme Court, the Electoral College System, and, at one time, the United States Senate, with members being installed by their state legislatures. And, even though the House of Representatives held the most Constitutionally-granted power, it was held in check by the Executive Branch, the Judicial Branch, and the Senate (a once indirectly appointed body of the Legislative Branch, I repeat). And so, it would seem, that the patriarchal comrades were on to something when they devised a process that would allow a “House of Representatives” to pass on a soaked-in and articulated wish of the majority to it’s bigger brother, the ”Senate,” who’d weigh the practicality, to the “Supreme Court,” who’d weigh the Constitutionality, to the “Executive Branch,” who’d weigh the enforceabilty. A good idea, right? It certainly worked for a while.
But, even though James Madison quite clearly conjectured, in Federalist Essay “10″, that too much democracy would only build a bridge between the rule of law and the influence of activist cabals like the American Civil Liberties Union, the AFL/CIO, Greenpeace USA, the NAACP, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, and the Sierra Club, we fell asleep…
Even though Madison quite clearly conjectured that groups such as the above-mentioned had agendas diametrically-opposed to the good of society, we fell asleep…
Even though Madison quite clearly prophesized that these groups would likely direct the course of government through unholy alliances and brazen dishonesty, we fell asleep…
Even though Madison hoped that a “federation of republics” would otherwise prevent such groups from having influence on a national level, we fell asleep…
Even our big-government paterfamilias, Alexander Hamilton, during the New York ratification forums, recognized that democracy “never possessed one feature of good government” and, yet, we slept anyway…
And, even though Hamilton continued with a description of prior democracies as governments possessed by a character that was “tyranny; their figure, deformity,” we snoozed away…
And, I might add, while we slept in the reverie of our ascension….we were burglarized, step by step!
And the steps of descension continue leading us down…
“Democracy passes into despotism.”–Plato
WHERE ARE WE, THEN? DO DESPOTIC WOLVES DON THE COSTUME OF DEMOCRATIC SHEEP?
How about a synopsis of the dismantling process?
The well-rounded thinkers who laid our foundation aimed to protect you and I from “encroachment” when they drew-up the U.S. Constitution, but the budding wolfkin in their sheepishly-democratic guise launched a step-by-step alteration when interpretive-slack was discovered in Article 1, Section 8, clause 17, in which it is stated that Congress shall have the power “to exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding 10 miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;”
The wolfkin of the 39th and 40th Congress kicked off the perversion which would ultimately grow a municipal government based in Washington, D.C. into the leviathan it is today–check your watch.
The intent of our framers’ was sufficiently given a back-handed smack when the flawed 14th citizenship Amendment was passed (but not really) during the post-Civil War era. Articles within the Constitution specifically direct how Amendments were/are to be ratified, and the Joint Resolution of the 14th Amendment was never submitted to or adopted by a Constitutional Congress, as directed by Article 1, Section 3, and Article 5; the Joint Resolution of the 14th Amendment was never submitted to the President for his approval, as directed by Article 1, Section 7; and the 14th Amendment was never ratified by three-fourths of all States within the Union, as directed by Article 5. Apologists of an educated/indoctrinated mien would likely allude to the Supreme Court’s upholding of the Amendment’s validity during Coleman v. Miller, 507 U.S. 448, 59 S. Ct. 972, but the activist-minded and emotionally-goosed Court members quite apparently brushed aside many Constitutional questions as if they didn’t exist.
I should note that there are many former slaves who would have otherwise been left in limbo after the passage of the 13thAmendment had it not been for the 14th citizenship Amendment. Keeping in mind the time and place the Amendment was ratified (but not really), WE should also bear in mind that the addition of language to OUR Constitution always provides ulterior-minded, power-charting politicians additional language that can be re-interpreted and misused for their own measure: of the first 150 cases dealing with the 14th Amendment, 15 involved former slaves or blacks, while the other 135 involved business entities!
Having said all that, I might add that my mother was born, raised and living in Denmark when my father–a Texan–came along. As the family grew, we went on an extensive world-wide and transient existence, from Germany to Spain to the U.S.A to Borneo to Singapore to the Philippines to the U.S.A. to Canada and back to the U.S.A.. She just recently became a U.S. citizen, and I can’t think of a finer American than my mother. All things being fair, I don’t believe the 14th Amendment is such a bad thing when it is used as intended, and for the right reasons…but it wasn’t rightfully instituted, and the meaning has been perverted, and this hasn’t helped the Republic…
…Nor was it helpful when American newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst, the father of yellow journalism, felt it necessary to push–or even make–news by sensationalizing and misr-reporting the events relevant to the sinking of the battleship U.S.S. Maine in 1898, essentially expediting the start of the Spanish-American war with questionable veracity and unfounded speculation…
…It forever changed the way many publishers and reporters dispensed of news…
…Nor was it helpful when, in 1913, all the powers-that-be agreed to the 17th-Amendment, an amendment which transmogrified a previously and indirectly appointed Senate into another representation of the ruling mob. Upon the installation of that amendment, the Senate ceased to be a fort of state’s rights or a check on the House; rather, it became an enabler of the House; it became an additional megaphone in the mob wish-fulfillment crusade of lawlessness; it became a foe of individual rights; it sidled-up to demagoguery–a component of unhinged democracy. Now they, too, answered to the factions of dubious agendas. Now they, too, were at the beck and sit of special-interest groups. This did not help the Republic for which we stand…
…which, as it stood, was a limited federal republic composed of correspondingly-limited state republics, each with a constitution of their own, reserving majority votes for the direct election of Representatives of Congress, direct election of Presidential Electors, direct votes as Jurors, direct votes as Grand Jurors…and that’s all folks…
…Nor was it helpful when the Federal Reserve system was established that same year.
How is that working out? How did it work out when the Rothschilds, Warburgs, and Rockefellers convened to institute an international banking cartel which created money in the same way God created humans–ex nihilo by divine fiat? Not so much a GSE (Government-Sponsored-Enterprise) as a GSRE (Government-Sponsored-Racketeering-Enterprise), the Federal Reserve spends literally pennies on the dollar to create a note while doing an about face and charging a submissive American public the note’s full value. It’s a combination of counterfeiting, fraud, and loan-sharking! The confiscation of funds from private citizens was already a four-decades-long process, stemming back to the Civil War, but when the Federal Reserve Act was passed, Miracle Gro saturated the soil, deca-durabolin coarsed through the roots, and the plant that stood negligently-by shot-up skyward akin to Jack’s Beanstalk and WE suffer the consequences. Not only was it the empowerment of a diabolical entity, it was unconstitutional in that: the U.S. Constitution prohibited “bills of credit” or paper notes; furthermore, the U.S. Constitution would have to be amended to rid itself of the gold/silver standard of money. The U.S. Constitution cannot be superceded by a statute!
Never mind, that the Federal Reserve exists as a monopoly in a country where monopolies are frowned upon. Do you want me to embrace the idea of a Federal Reserve system? Then give it a competitor! Better yet, get rid of it. It doesn’t belong here, not within our Republic’s embrace…
…And neither does the Internal Revenue Service–a collection agency and henchman for the Federal Reserve, international banksters and D.C. elitists–which doesn’t stand on constitutional ground either.
Does it not matter that the IRS violates the Law guaranteed by the Bill of Rights?
“The bold effort the present (central) bank had made to control the government are but premonitions of the fate that await the American people should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this institution or the establishment of another like it,” said Andrew Jackson, after shutting down a precursor to the Federal Reserve during the Republic’s early days. I wonder whatJackson would have to say about the Federal Reserve? I wonder what Jackson would have to say about our discontinuance of the gold standard? I wonder what Jackson would have to say about the International Monetary Fund? I wonder what Jackson would have to say about the World Bank?
And soak in the bureaucratic lead-blanket of FDR’s New Deal, which gave us the Social Security Act, the Emergency Banking Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Civilian Conservation Corps, the Agricultural Adjustment Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Civil Works Administration, the Indian Reorganization Act, the National Industrial Recovery Act, the Public Works Association, the Homeowners Loan Corporation, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Works Progress Administration, the Office of War Information & Bureau of Motion Pictures, the War Production Board, The National Labor Relations Act, the Farm Security Administration, the Federal Emergency Relief Administration…and the Federal Communications Commission.
And savor the flavor of the Environmental Protection Agency, an unconstitutional entity charged with protecting the environment by enforcing regulations gleaned from congressional laws. You see, Congress shall pass the law…and THEN the EPA is to act…not the other way around. They’ve essentially gone rogue in many instances: partnering up with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in setting fuel-economy standards for the auto industry without congressional consent; establishing a climate and energy policy for the nation to follow without congressional consent; modifying the Clean Air Act to avoid an administrative rigmarole of it’s own doing, without congressional consent. And you can bet your bottom dollar that, wherever a drilling-moratorium is executed or a coal-burning power source is shut down, fingerprints of EPA agents can be found everywhere.
Does it not matter that, step-by-step, over the last 150-years, measures have been taken to strip our Republic of what it once stood for? Does it not matter that Congress has, time and time again for political reasons, delegated it’s legislative powers to various bureaucracies and the Executive Branch unlawfully? Does it not matter that we are unconstitutionally stripping citizens of their hard-earned money to fund the National Endowment for the Arts? Does it not matter that WE, by force, are paying for peanut research in Alabama? Does it not matter that WE, by force, are paying for beaver management in North Carolina? Does it not matter that we sit on idle while the government uses our money to fund foolhardy Omnibus Bills, bail-out packages and stimulus plans? Does it not matter that all three branches of our government are currently operating less within the constraints of the U.S. Constitution and more within the unbridled activism of a despotic democracy?
Does it not matter that the government laid Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on the shoulders of citizens to bear? Does it not matter that the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 opened the housing market to unqualified buyers of homes? Does it not matter that the unconstitutional Federal Reserve established an unconstitutional Community Affairs Office to strongarm lenders into making MORE risky loans, even as foreclosure rates were skyrocketing? Did the Alternative Mortgage Transaction Parity Act of 1982 end up NOT mattering? Did the Tax Reform Act of 1986 end up NOT mattering?Did the New Community Reinvestment Act of 1995 end up NOT mattering? Did the influx of festering schemes and policies and mandates that brought us to the brink of financial ruin, authored and enforced by our elected and appointed wool-garbed jackals over the course of many, many years, NOT matter? And why is it that the feral tongue waggers propose a doubling-down–strike that, an exponential increase–of the same reckless behavior as a means to “fix” the problem?
I am lost. Is this a product of having no foresight? Is this the product of gross incompetence? Or is it, as the Joker would say: “All part of the plan!”
Our fledgling “democracy,” our withering “republic,” is a spinning jenny wire-drawn with more bureaucratic filament than 12 nations can bear. The website usa.gov lists approximately 600 federal agencies, and this doesn’t count the sub-sects and boards missing from the list. A few of the agencies – Congress, United States Marine Corps, National Security Agency – are acceptable. Some of them – AMTRAK, Community Oriented Policing Services – are laughable. Some of them–(Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, Federal Labor Relations Authority), (Council of Economic Advisers, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Economic and Statistics Administration, Economic Research Service)–seem like mirror images of one another. Some of them–Office of Thrift Supervision, Architect of the Capitol, Innovation and Improvement Office–leave more questions than anything. Many of them–the Drug Enforcement Agency, the Department of Energy (or lack thereof), the Department of Education (or lack thereof), the Department of Health and Human Services (Dr. Magoo’s office)–have no constitutional footing. Most of them simply don’t belong.
And yet, there they are, sucking our money like pecuniary leeches.
Is it all part of the plan?
“A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have.”–Thomas Jefferson
And as the democracy grows, so too does the prophetic-resonance of James Madison’s Federalist Essay #10, regarding the inevitable influence of single-minded, stand-alone factions…
…There are over 18,000 listed associations or advocacy groups dedicated to abortion & reproduction, men & women, civil rights, corporate accountability, peace & war, criminal justice, various racial & ethnic groups, various religions, state & local governments, tax reform, government reform, homeless & poor, gun control, immigration, public interests, environmental land use & water resources, gays & lesbians & bisexuals & transgendereds, international affairs, education, social security & medicare, animal rights and welfare, aged population, consumer advocacy, disabled, business & labor & economics, children, alcohol & tobacco & drugs.
Think Code Pink: a radical anti-war guerilla group which hounded wounded troops outside Walter Reed Army Hospital; a backer of SocialistPartyUSA with ties to Hamas and a supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood; a throng lead and founded by four experienced activists, hardcore communists, and Fidel Castro sympathizers.
Think NAACP: the 100-year old organization that voted on a resolution to deem ALL Tea-Partiers as ‘racist’ in spite of the failure for anyone to come up with documented proof, even with a financial reward being promised upon evidentiary submission; a civil-rights throwback who’s members nodded and cheered with approval when Shirley Sherrod, USDA Georgia Director of Rural Development, related a story in which she was discriminating against a farmer because he was white; the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, or moreso resembling the National Association for the Abolishment of Caucasian People.
Think ACORN: the Association of Community Organizers for Reform Now, whom stormed bank lobbies and terrorized loan officers into extending money to unqualified homebuyers; the club of coconuts who employed the type of individuals who’d advise a pimp and prostitute on how to lie to the IRS–via getting a home loan, of course, then laundering money, and then falsifying tax documents–so that the pimp and prostitute could open up a brothel selling the services of underage girls; a legion of legumes that can’t seem to shake the incessant plague of voter-fraud recriminations.
And once you’ve thought of Code Pink and the NAACP and ACORN, think of the fine whispers they blow in our officials’ ears, and then multiply that by 6,000….
Of course, there are lobbyists for the media, as well. Oh, yes, how could I forget the media and their contribution to our “democracy”…
…And as if the news was not already twisted enough, thanks to the transformative consequences of William Randolph Hearst and yellow journalism, the advent of CNN, CNBC, MSNBC, HLN and FOX NEWS came along and continue to carry along a 24-hour offering of the “twist,” creating a bubble of mis-informed social thought that grows–like the housing market bubble–to an unsustainable magnitude…
…And they have the undivided attention of monolithic bedwetters everywhere, poisoning the wells of critical thought; and they have their own lobbyists, whispering sweet-nothings into the ears of government officials; and the authorities then pick and choose via the unconstitutional FCC, who shall win and who shall lose…
…At least, they attempt to do so…
…Remember the Fairness (censorship) Doctrine?
Is it all part of the plan?
But maybe Madison’s prophecy fell short of reality…
Perhaps it would turn out worse than he imagined, as interests around the globe and among secret societies would have a hand in matters as well. Let’s start with something big and “out-there” before we filter our way down to the less known…
The United Nations is a post-cursor to the League of Nations–an organization we were wise enough to avoid many years ago. But things have changed. The sovereignty of nations, particularly OUR nation is at risk as along as we continue to find this body of bona fide bureaucrats–elected by no one, accountable to no one, and representative of no one–relevant. The UN’s aim is to achieve world governance, which would demand the ultimate oppression and dissolution of OUR constitution. I have a hard time recalling the last time the UN supported the USA in any controversy brought before it. Maybe this is because, of the 192 members, the largest voting block is Islamic, whereas the second largest voting block is Marxist. But we kowtow to them and seek their approval before taking action in any instant. Possibly because it is part of the plan.
The Council on Foreign Relations was established as the American cohort to the Royal Institute of International Affairs in 1921. Of the founding members: J.P. Morgan, J.D. Rockefeller, Paul Warburg and others of the same circle which brought us the Federal Reserve System. The Rockefellers eventually usurped control since the one-world-government suited their philosophy. In the mid- to late-1920s, America experienced prosperity that was unprecedented. The new Federal Reserve expanded the money supply by two-thirds, and then the market crashed, and many investors were ruined, but not those within the CFR circle–who proceeded to buy-up the insolvent firms. And then came Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who’s son-in-law reported: “…Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, were carefully manufactured for him in advance by the CFR-One World Money group. Brilliantly…he exploded that prepared ammunition in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people–and thus paid off and retained his internationalist public support.”
The New Deal could only be financed through borrowing from the same people who gave us the Federal Reserve, the same people who reigned supreme within the ranks of the CFR. The same people who caused the Great Depression, bailed us out! Since that time: almost every United States Secretary of State has been a CFR member; every Secretary of Defense has been a CFR member; the CIA has predominantly been under CFR control; nearly every presidential candidate has been a CFR member. And every one of them, whether they admit it or believe it or feel it or not, has pushed the concept of a global government, controlled by the United Nations.
Oh, yes. There we are again. The United Nations. Did you know that the existing United Nations organization is a CFR creation, housed on Manhattan land donated by none-other than David Rockefeller?
Did you know that the mass media is largely controlled by the CFR?
Admiral Chester Ward, a 10-year member of the CFR, said there exists “a much smaller group but more powerful…made up of Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in control of the global government…This CFR faction is headed by the Rockefeller brothers.”
This is not an activist group or a lobbying faction; this is one of the most powerful private organizations in the world, and they do not have the Republic’s best interests in mind. They are composed of leaders in academia, public service, business and the media. They have a plan! Or, as James Warburg, son of CFR founder Paul Warburg, once testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: “We shall have a world government whether or not you like it–by conquest or consent.”
But it’s all in the name of “democracy.”
And it was in the name of “democracy” that David Rockefeller, frazzled by the attention being paid to the CFR, launched a sub-section, or mask, known as the Trilateral Commission, composed of circa 325 shot-callers in the business industry,banking industry, and political realm. He was hoping to take attention away from the CFR. But they are merely one in the same ol’ same ol’ global game.
Reported as an entity who’s aim it is to bring economic cooperation between America, Europe, and Japan, the truth of the matter is that this is a CFR soldier specializing in the creation of the economic interdependence necessary to bring about a global governing system. Co-founding the Trilateral Commission along with Rockefeller was Zbigniew Brzezinski, former Chairman of the Chase Manhattan Bank, director of numerous multinational corporations and “endowment funds,” a central figure of the CFR, assistant to President Jimmy Carter in national security affairs, and renowned prognosticator of one-world idealism.
As with the CFR, there are many individuals in position of power, residing as government officials of the highest order, media moguls and corporate authorities–do I even need to mention banksters–who are card-carrying members of the Trilaterals. And the Plan is unnervingly clear. Doctor Johannes B. Koeppl, Ph. D, and former German defense ministry official/adviser to former NATO Secretary General Manfred Werner, professed: “The interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the CFR, the Trilateral Commission–founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller–and the Bilderberger Group, have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next few years. They are not fighting against terrorists. They are fighting against citizens…In 1983/1984 I warned of a take-over of world government being orchestrated by these people. There was an obvious plan to subvert true democracies and selected leaders were not being chosen based upon character, but upon their loyalty to an economic system run by the elites and dedicated to preserving their power. All we have now are pseudo-democracies.”
Pseudo-democracy is better than no democracy, right?
How about the Bilderbergers? Are they for democracy? Are they for pseudo-democracy? Are they for the Republic?
The Bilderberger Group was formed in 1954 and, like the CFR & Trilateral Commission, it’s members fill our capitol halls, our academic halls, and our media air-waves. It was primarily the brainchild of Prince Bernhard from the Netherlands, the Rothschilds, and the Rockefellers. The overall goal was/is to bring about a One World Government controlled by the central banking systems of the Rockefellers and Rothschilds. Components of the Bilderberg plan are: Zero-Growth Society aka the exportation of Canadian and American industries to poorer countries such as Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, and Nicaragua, which would thus make one of the key NAFTA objectives realized; One International Identity; A Centralized Power-Grab from the People via Mind Control, chillingly described by Bilderberg member and Trilateral founder Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era; State of Perpetual Imbalance through the manufacturing of crises; a Western Trading Bloc by means of expanding NAFTA throughout the Western Hemisphere; a One-World Legal & Enforcement System; and Centralized Control of all Education through history revisionism….
In over 50-years of meetings that bring together unprecedented power and money at the same time in the same location, information remains sparse, or hidden, or protected. Information regarding this group generally comes from the persistent efforts of Daniel Esulin, Alex Jones, Armen Victorian and multiple other researchers who’ve spent an extraordinary amount of their time chasing down attendees past and present to bring it all into focus. But, in spite of the claims that nefarious machinations are afoot, some people speak to the contrary, some people whom are respectable and forthright in my knowledge. But my knowledge is limited….
Take Charles Krauthammer, for instance, the man of a mind I adore. With regards to a proposed super-highway that was to run clear from Mexico through the United States and into Canada, Krauthammer had THIS to say about the possible involvement of the Bilderbergers: “Look, part of this great conspiracy is recent evidence that the governor of Texas, who’s a Republican, who supports this highway from Laredo to Oklahoma, was recently at the Bilderberg Conference, which is supposedly one of these Trilateral Conferences involving financiers who want to globalize the world and pull strings. But, let me tell you, I’ve spoken to the Bilderberg Conference, as has George Will and Paul Gigot; and I can assure you that Gigot, Will, and I are not three amigos who are going to order in black helicopters to force Americans to watch hockey on Monday nights and Soccer on Sunday.”
I’ll concede to Mr. Krauthammer that this was probably the best he could do considering the Bilderbergs have a standing non-attribution rule, a rule forbidding attendees from discussing the group. But, am I to believe that an erudite but trusting columnist from the USA, face-to-face with an erudite and trusting Portuguese professor of Communication Science from the New University of Lisbon, will be made privy to the shadowy confabs taking place between an Advisory Committee (inner-circle) member like David Rockefeller and, say, George Soros? Am I, granting the most innocuos declarations, supposed to believe that a mere discussion between the world’s top globalist movers and shakers won’t eventually have political ramifications? Am I supposed to dis-believe the extensive literature on the Bilderberger group? Am I supposed to scoff at the reports of Toronto Star journalist, John Deverell? Am I supposed to scoff at the ‘insider-leaks’ made public? Am I supposed to look away from an incident where top CFR, Trilateral, and Bilderberg members discuss the discontinuation of the US dollar? Am I suppose to skip over the work of Jim Marrs, Daniel Esulin, Alex Jones and Armen Victorian? Am I supposed to ignore the Paddy Ashdown Diaries? Am I supposed to omit from memory the banned articles of ‘Lombard’ reporter C. Gordon Tether?
Perhaps, I’ll turn a deaf ear to this statement by David Rockefeller, given after one of his ’round-table’ meetings: “We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
New York Times, Washington Post and Time Magazine: Are you familiar with their brand of news? Are you familiar with the slant?
In what world does it make sense that the Davos World Economic Forum, G8, and G20 Summits are worthy of coverage in every newspaper, talk-show, and television news report, when crickets are all WE hear when it comes to an annual meeting of THE power-elite? Bilderberg meetings are attended by Presidents of the IMF, the World Bank, Federal Reserve Chairmen, CEOs of the most powerful corporations in the world, Kings & Queens & Princes, CIA Directors, General Secretaries of NATO, European & Canadian Prime Ministers, American Congress members, editors/owners/CEOs of all the top newspapers, magazines, and television networks. Why is this not newsworthy?
And how is it not newsworthy that relatively unknown politicians–Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, Jack Santer, Romano Prod, George Robertson and Lionel Jospin, to name a few—get invites to a Bilderberg conference to suddenly skyrocket to power in it’s aftermath? Why is that not newsworthy? I’ll tell you why: it’s because, like the politicians and academicians and business-owners and Royalty and financiers, the shot-callers of the media trod along with the rest of the wolves, feigning the mien of Argus-eyed sheep…just like the Fabians!
The Fabian Society
“…You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you like it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live, you would have to live well”–George Bernard Shaw, Fabian Society.
The Fabian Society can credit it’s namesake to Fabius Cuncator, a Roman who encouraged stealth & deliberate revolution vice a direct & unmistakeable attack–it would later be modernized by Saul Alinsky.
The society was founded in 1884. George Bernard Shaw started publishing essays on the movement as early as 1889. Among those who were close to him: Sidney Webb, Beatrice Webb, Annie Besant, and Eleanor Marx. Eleanor was one of Karl Marx’s daughters and, shortly after the Fabian creation, she moved to the United States to establish identical groups. As well, Sidney and Beatrice toured American Colleges where they cultivated a following amongst native socialist intellectuals. They had a PLAN: By degrees and inches, they aimed to change the meaning of our legal concepts through conceptual legerdemain, and to codify those changes with arguments of Fabian lawyers brought before Fabian judges; in essence, the language wouldn’t necessarily change; however, the implementation would no longer be in the hands of citizens and their elected representatives; rather, it would be in the hands of bureaucratic converts.
The ACLU was founded by Harold Laski, a Fabian disciple of Sidney and Beatrice, as well as other Fabian thinkers John Dewey, Norman Thomas, Felix Frankfurter, Harry Ward, William Foster, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, Eugene Debs, and Clarence Darrow—ACLU Attorney at the Monkey-Scopes Trial. Frankfurter was appointed to the Supreme Court by CFR puppet Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Ward quite handily planted the seed which led to numerous other sects of Protestantism which border on Godlessness. Dewey is the one we can thank for the continual dumbing-down force of today’s educational process. Darrow argued the case which led to the inclusion of evolution as a religious a doctrine.
Wrapping themselves in the blanket of liberty, Fabians seek to dissolve individual rights. They cloak themselves in the Constitution, yet they transfer power to bureaucracies composed of friends, bureaucracies paid for by the ones who’s freedoms they wish to destroy.
“Make the enemy live up to it’s own rules.”–Saul Alinsky–aka–”Make us live under an inundation of new laws derived from a deliberate re- or mis-interpretation of the Constitution to be mandated by your office-holding friends”–John Brewer.
If Fabianism is a six-pack of beer, environmentalism/evolution is the plastic thing that holds it all together. The Green movement reeks of Fabianism.
Early Fabians were fervid in their rejection of GOD, and they chose the written word as a means to transform the mindset of an unwitting/unbeknownst public. They adjusted the manner in which education was delivered so that students, as opposed to learning the facts, learned the adjusted concept in order to progressively bring in an new world. As was the case in Britain, education in America became a conduit for destroying traditional beliefs, attitudes, and values. These concepts were later embraced by the short-lived League of Nations and the Current United Nations, which is teeming with CFR members, Bilderberg members, Islamists, Marxists, and Fabians; never mind that the United Nations is solidly resting on Manhattan land provided to it by globalist David Rockefeller.
Upon the one-two punch of WWI and the Great Depression, Fabianism flourished and was co-opted by the Liberals who seized control of Congress for many years after. Minds of the Fabian tenor celled themselves in public & private administrations, in factories & businesses, within all parties of governmental, international organizations and, above all, our schools. They infiltrated the bureaucracies, they were appointed to crucial offices of policy-making, they joined the CFR, they attended Bilderberg conferences, they became close advisers to David Rockefeller and his ‘inner-circle.’ They became the last two leaders–Tony Blair, Gordon Brown–of Britain. The London School of Economics: a branch of the Fabian Society. And, all over but the shouting, they are here, running our government, leading our businesses, teaching our kids, and dispensing propaganda on the news.
The Fabian emblem: A wolf in sheep’s clothing.
These are but a few of many problems that can’t be disclosed within the parameters of a blog.
After the first shot at Fort Sumter, things have gone downhill. The myriad things I have listed in this article are but one fry in a super-sized un-happy meal. There is much more to the saga, but it would take a multi-volume work of War & Peace-sized tomes to cover the gist in all it’s inglorious shadings.
Interpretive slack was discovered in our Constitution by the 39th and 40th Congress–who ran with it and never looked back. The flawed 14th citizenship Amendment was never ratified appropriately nor sent to the President for approval; it has been used beyond the illimitable scope of time and space to push unrelated and ulterior-minded agendas. And, coincidentally enough, around the same time our Constitution was first being subjected to “conceptual revisionism,” Fabian agents were roaming our nation’s academic landscape, looking for scholars, professors and orators to enact their plank for…”conceptual revisionism.” William Randolph Hearst crossed the line separating news-reporting from news-creating, and ushered in the commonly held practice of yellow journalism. By means of the 17th Amendment, our Republic was weakened by transforming an indirectly appointed Senate into another body thumbed-down by the mob-rule of lawlessness. That same year, global-minded financiers congregated at Jekyll Island to establish a central banking scheme which would come to fruition in the Federal Reserve–which would, shortly thereafter, increase American money supply by two-thirds during a time of great prosperity and send our society plummeting into the economic abyss. The very global financiers who created the Federal Reserve, and CFR, were the very same global financiers–and CFR stewards–who usurped control of the businesses destroyed by their monetary Frankenstein. Followers of the Fabian modus operandi firmly entrenched themselves in our businesses, factories, public/private administrations, political parties, international organizations, learning institutions, court systems; as well, they secured ranks within the CFR. Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a globalist meat-puppet for the CFR, executed his marching orders with a pizzazz and charisma antithetical to his scorned and ostensibly-imperialistic predecessor–sound familiar? Our fortress was laminated with a thick-&-murky Deal that was New, and refreshing, and compassionate-sounding. Mandates and resolutions and laws and subsidies and regulations filled the air like an L.A. smog. Our citizenry took to the role of a “junkie” to the governments “peddler.” And we never looked back. Because it was good. And the United Nations was created, filling it’s assembly with un-elected, un-accountable, and un-representative globalists of the CFR and Fabian ilk, to sit alongside Islamists & Marxists as it resolved what the rest of the world should do, as it resolved to dictate to the United States what would be best, in terms of the global community vice the Republic. And the mandates and resolutions and laws and subsidies and regulations continued to pour in. And the cost of citizenship continued to increase. Then, a throng of power-elite gathered at the Hotel De Bilderberg in Oosterbeek. Among them: CFR members, Fabians, global financiers, CEOs, media magnates, Royalty and esteemed academicians. And the manner in which we fought wars changed. And the manner in which we conducted international relations changed. And the Bilderbergers continued to meet, year after year. And CFR members continued to meet & greet wherever…whenever…as did the Fabians. And the FCC controlled the airwaves with Draconian bias, as they still do. And the media incorporated a “conceptual interpretation” to their reports, as they still do. The laws and subsidies and regulations never ceased. Unconstitutional government bodies popped up everywhere one looked, and no one said a thing. Subsidies climbed with the Great Society. A Trilateral Commission was created by the Crowned Prince of the CFR–David Rockefeller. CFR members and Bilderbergers and Fabians joined the Trilaterals, and Trilaterals became Bilderbergers, and Fabians joined in wherever…whenever…only time and place dictated who they were for the moment. Lobbyist and Activist weeds grew uncontrollably throughout the yard of yards–our beloved Republic–and they ruthlessly pulled the ears of our officials, elected or otherwise, as they still do. The laws and mandates piled high until, once again, we were brought to the brink of financial ruin, whereupon global financiers–CFR members and Bilderbergers and Trilaterals and Fabians–usurped control of the businesses that were destroyed. Then came our current President, apologizing to the world, espousing the ideas of a global lean, executing his marching orders with a pizzazz and charisma antithetical to his scorned and ostensibly-imperialistic predecessor. The legislation is overwhelming in size, scope and frequency. The cost is staggering. New age; same game!
Who’s in charge here?
The Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, and Fabian Society are but only four examples out of many. There are other groups out there with names like “the Illuminati”, “the Skulls & Bones”, “the Bohemian Group”, “the Knights of Malta”, “the Knights Templar”, “33rd-degree Free Masons”, “Americorps” and the “Rosicrucians”. Some of them are present and accounted for. Some of them may be no more than a fraternal gathering of harmless intent. Some of them may not be who we think they are. Some of them may be obsolete and only exist as a conspiratorial ghost story. Whatever the case may be, each to each, something is afoot and we must be aware that there is an entirely different sphere of global policy being orchestrated, in one fashion or another…a sphere of global policy being orchestrated which doesn’t make the 6 o’clock news. This is not a call for paranoia. Well, maybe just a little bit.